Voting (was Re: PEP 318
Ville Vainio
ville at spammers.com
Tue Mar 23 01:35:30 EST 2004
>>>>> "Skip" == Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> writes:
Skip> It will probably be a BDFL pronouncement. After all, that's
Skip> why he's the
Of course it will - still, that didn't stop us from voting before :-).
There should be a kind of "standard voting system" for PEPs, w/o
administration overhead of occasional seperate vote. It would be a
data point, if nothing else. The result of the vote could be stored
together w/ the accepted/approved pep.
Actually, any third party could whip out the voting system, but the
illusion of authority would be more convincing if PSF was involved.
It would be fun, esp. if it was easier than the conditional expression
vote of yore :-).
FWIW, I prefer
def f(x,y) [wrapper,wrapper...]:
pass
or
def f(x,y) as iterable:
pass
and would oppose
def f [wrapper, wrapper...] (x,y):
pass
Like others, I want to see the param list right next to the function
name.
--
Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
More information about the Python-list
mailing list