Static typing
Bjorn Pettersen
BPettersen at NAREX.com
Fri Jul 25 18:03:56 EDT 2003
> From: Bruno Desthuilliers [mailto:bdesth.nospam at removeme.free.fr]
>
> Michael Muller wrote:
> > Is there currently any plan to introduce static typing in any future
> > version of Python?
>
> AARGGHHHH ! NO !! DON'T DO THAT !!! NEVER AGAIN !!!!
>
> (sorry, uncontrolable nervous reaction... 3 valiums latter... : )
>
> > (I'm not entirely sure that "static typing" is the right
> > term: what I'm talking about is the declaration of types
> > for variables, parameters and function return values).
>
> This is the right term. This is also the wrong thing for Python IMHO.
Almost. It's "explicit static typing" (vs. e.g. SML which has "implicit
static typing").
> > I know there was a "types SIG" which introduced several
> > proposals, but it expired quite a while ago, and I was
> > wondering whether whether some consensus has been reached
> > on the subject
>
> <flame-war-mode='on'>
> Yes :
> dynamic typing is good a Good Thing(tm),
> static typing is Evil(tm) !-)
> </flame-war-mode>
who: implicit/explicit/both
when: compile-time/run-time/both/neither
what: check-all/check-some/check-none
choose one from each column'ly y'rs
-- bjorn
More information about the Python-list
mailing list