Stackless Python, eventual merge?

[Martin v. Löwis]

Michael Schneider <michaels at one.net> writes:

> Could someone please explain to a "confused" python user. Why the
> current version of stackless python would not be distributed like
> threads???

Very easy: because nobody makes it so. That, in turn, is because
nobody works on making it so. 

Christian (rightfully) points out that this is not his obligation:
this is free software, he is not obliged to do anything - unless you
pay him to do something. Nobody else is obliged to incorporate
Stackless into Standard Python either. If you want this to happen,
contribute.

Regards,
Martin