Q: PEP progressions, and Rational type in particular?

[Aahz Maruch]

In article <slrna7j5ia.ki5.brent_b at eris.io.com>,
Brent Burton <brent_b at i_o.com> wrote:
>
>In the case of Rational types, Python 2.3 and 2.4 are referred to
>for __future__ and warning-by-default operation.  Does this mean
>2.2 has no rational type at all?

That's correct.  Unfortunately, there's no clear single roadmap that
explains what features are available in which version, but a good
approximation can be obtained by reading Andrew Kuchling's What's New
links at http://www.amk.ca/python/
-- 
                      --- Aahz  <*>  (Copyright 2002 by aahz at pobox.com)

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6                 http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista

"How come we choose from just two people for President but more than 50
for Miss America?"  --AEN