JavaScript considered harmful

[Mark Hammond]

Andrew Kuchling wrote:

> aahz at panix.com (Aahz Maruch) writes:


> Personally, I'd implement with cookies.  Newer user agents have the
> flexibility to allow cookies for some domains and reject them for
> others (but does IE, which is the 900-pound gorilla here?), 


FWIW, IE appears to have way to block either/and "1st party" and "3rd 
party" cookies.  Help explains "1st party" cookies as originating from 
the site you are viewing, and "3rd party" as originating from another.
Not sure if finer grained customization is hiding somewhere...

Mozilla has a similar option, but presented differently.

Mark.