emacs in python mode does the correct thing, says the styleguide.
Laura Creighton
lac at cd.chalmers.se
Wed May 2 08:33:02 EDT 2001
But I do not think so. Here is the example given:
def __init__(self, width, height,
color='black', emphasis=None, highlight=0):
if width == 0 and height == 0 and \
color == 'red' and emphasis == 'strong' or \
highlight > 100:
raise ValueError, "sorry, you lose"
if width == 0 and height == 0 and (color == 'red' or
emphasis is None):
raise ValueError, "I don't think so"
Blob.__init__(self, widt, height,
color, emphasis, highlight)
------------------------
I think that lining up continuation lines to match the first open
round parenthesis is rather silly. If instead of __init__ the function
was called ReallyDescriptiveLongNamedGraphicalWidgetWithBellsOnIt
you wouldn't have room to pass any arguments to it at all. :-) I
have caught myself shortening variable names in order to get things
to fit on `only one line'. I can easily see myself deciding that `hl' is
a much better variable name than `highlight' if calling it `highlight'
would push the function definition to 3 lines rather than 2.
Is there some compelling reason to want this behavior, rather than, for
instance, one more indentation level than the line you are currently on
that I am unaware of?
Laura Creighton
lac at cd.chalmers.se
More information about the Python-list
mailing list