zip() : how about braid()
Peter Schneider-Kamp
peter at schneider-kamp.de
Thu Jul 20 14:36:31 EDT 2000
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> It's silly, but has anyone considered
>
> marry()
>
> or
>
> partner()
>
> as names for the function?
It's not that silly. An older proposal favored marry().
But imho marry() and partner() implicate the zipping
of two lists (even stronger than the zipper zip()).
OTOH somebody mentioned that it would be a great
political statement. Marriage of an arbitrary number
of arbitrary types (read: genders).
Peter
--
Peter Schneider-Kamp ++47-7388-7331
Herman Krags veg 51-11 mailto:peter at schneider-kamp.de
N-7050 Trondheim http://schneider-kamp.de
More information about the Python-list
mailing list