Operators for everything (was Re: Operators for matrix)
Timothy H. Keitt
keitt at nceas.ucsb.edu
Tue Jul 25 15:49:08 EDT 2000
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Phil Austin wrote:
> >
> > %% Arithmetic Operators (base)
> > %*% Matrix Multiplication (base)
> > %/% Arithmetic Operators (base)
> > %in% Value Matching (base)
> > %o% Outer Product of Arrays (base)
> > %x% Kronecker Product of Arrays (base)
> > & Logical Operators (base)
> > && Logical Operators (base)
>
> I think this must be the *worst* looking syntax that's
> been proposed so far...
I'm agnostic as I don't use currently python. (I'm evaluating it for
teaching numerical analysis and modeling.) But I will say, there is not
going to be a 'beautiful' syntax solution based on the available symbols
(and how attractive a syntax looks depends highly on what you are used
to seeing). Keep to that argument and I guarantee that the issue will
not be resolved.
Tim
--
Timothy H. Keitt
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
735 State Street, Suite 300, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Phone: 805-892-2519, FAX: 805-892-2510
http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/~keitt/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list