zip or marry etc

[Bjorn Pettersen]

Robin Becker wrote:
> 
> I suppose there must be something desperately wrong with using the
> __mul__ for sequences to indicate the set pairwise product. I would
> certainly be for
> 
> x,y in A*B rather than x,y in zip(A,B) or marry(A,B), but since * is the
> obvious operator it must be that someone else has reserved it.

if A is of a class defining __mul__ (or B is of a class defining
__rmul__) you'll have problems.

How about A @ B... <wink>

running-and-hiding'ly y'rs
-- bjorn