Discussion: new operators for numerical computation

[Robin Becker]

In article <39771F6D.A9A0A26B at yale.edu>, Paul Magwene
<paul.magwene at yale.edu> writes
>Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
...
>Of all the proposals so far, I find Konrad's suggestion to be the most
>appealing.
>I could definitely get used to the following:
>
>A(*)B
>A(/)B
>A(+.*)B
>...etc
>
>Please keep * for elementwise multiplication like in NumPy.  There is
>already a large installed user/codebase which uses it as such.
>
>I personally find A at B very hard to parse visually. @ justs seems to just
>smack of that other P language. ;-)
>
...
I like this too, but would the operators have to be parsed that way as
triples or quintuples etc
-- 
Robin Becker