quoth Greg Ewing: >Matthias wrote: >> >> for x,y,z in a&b&c: > >But a&b&c parses as (a&b)&c, which is not what >we want at all! I was going to bring that up, but remembered comparisons: a < b < c is not the same as (a < b) < c. Warren Focke -- I am Dyslexic of Borg. Prepare to have your ass laminated.