Still no new license -- but draft text available

[Martijn Faassen]

Gareth McCaughan <Gareth.McCaughan at pobox.com> wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:

> [someone else:]
>>> I'm not for certain if you're a _Dutch_ bot, Tim, but if so, you get a
>>> point here not only for wit but also for using a 75-cent word like
>>> "epistimelogical" (which, BTW, I just used the mouse to copy--I didn't
>>> dare try to spell it myself).
>> 
>> And how right you are, as it's "epistomological"! As far as I know, 
>> Tim isn't a Dutch bot, but I'm Dutch, and naturally that means I know
>> what the word means and even what it's spelled like.

> Amusing. The correct spelling is actually "epistemological".

> (I'm not Dutch, by the way.)

Ah, silly me. Of course I knew that and I was trying to be amusing.

No-really-well-okay-not-and-don't-ever-spelling-flame-again-ly yours,

Martijn
-- 
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?