Python 2.0 and Stackless

[Mike Fletcher]

I was, of course, talking more about the licensing thread.  I too have seen
the stackless thread before, and wasn't taking it as one of the signs of the
apocalypse.  I figure eventually our raids on the CVS tree (Chris-bombs,
mostly) will slip past Guido's defences and one day we'll make the
announcement: "You've been using Stackless for the past three years and
never knew." Then Guido will be forced to accept the fait accomplis and life
will continue.

Are you sure you're not already using Stackless?
Are those real threads in your scheduler? 
It's version 2.0.  Do you know where your execution frame is?
<evil cackle>
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: m.faassen at vet.uu.nl [mailto:m.faassen at vet.uu.nl]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 3:25 PM
To: python-list at python.org
Subject: Re: Python 2.0 and Stackless


Mike Fletcher <mfletch at tpresence.com> wrote:
[snip lots of fun]

Thanks for this. :)

> PS: Why did CLP get so contentious all of a sudden?

The Stackless stuff is nothing new; I've seen this particular thread pop
up at various times for quite a while now, though this is a particularly
big one. So we must've been contentious all along! :)

Regards,

Martijn
-- 
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
-- 
http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list