[Python-legal-sig] Round 2: Is CLA required to send and accept edits for Python documentation?

[Antoine Pitrou]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:31:05 -0500
Richard Fontana <fontana at sharpeleven.org> wrote:
> 
> Does the PSF not have a public justification for its CLA? 

I cannot answer for the PSF, despite being a PSF member myself.
However, one reasonable rationale for the CLA is that it allows further
relicensing, e.g. to a further version of the "PSF license".

Regards

Antoine.