[Python-ideas] Revisiting dedicated overloadable boolean operators

[Grégory Lielens]

Obviously I'm +1 on this, but a little bit less so than at the time of proposal, let's say +0.8...at PEP 225 time, @ matmul operator did not exist (it was the competing PEP 211, also to address matrix multiply, that proposed @...both were rejected at the time lol).
But now that @ exists, there would be either redundancy or lack of orthogonality among the family of multiplication infix operators...