[Python-ideas] + operator on generators
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Tue Jun 27 07:10:22 EDT 2017
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:23:36PM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The downside to this proposal is that it adds some conceptual complexity
> to Python operators. Apart from `is` and `is not`, all Python operators
> call one or more dunder methods. This is (as far as I know) the first
> operator which has fall-back functionality if the dunder methods aren't
> defined.
I remembered there is a precedent here. The == operator tries __eq__
before falling back on object identity, at least in Python 2.
py> getattr(object(), '__eq__')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'object' object has no attribute '__eq__'
py> object() == object()
False
--
Steve
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list