[Python-ideas] PEP: Distributing a Subset of the Standard Library
Steve Dower
steve.dower at python.org
Mon Nov 28 17:33:31 EST 2016
On 28Nov2016 1419, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I'd suggest that we additional specify that if we find a
> foo.missing.py, then the code is executed but -- unlike a regular
> module load -- it's not automatically inserted into
> sys.modules["foo"]. That seems like it could only create confusion.
> And it doesn't restrict functionality, because if someone really wants
> to implement some clever shenanigans, they can always modify
> sys.modules["foo"] by hand.
In before Brett says "you can do this with an import hook", because,
well, we can do this with an import hook :)
Given that, this wouldn't necessarily need to be an executable file. The
finder could locate a "foo.missing" file and raise ModuleNotFoundError
with the contents of the file as the message. No need to allow/require
any Python code at all, and no risk of polluting sys.modules.
Cheers,
Steve
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list