[Python-ideas] real numbers with SI scale factors: next steps

[Barry Warsaw]

On Aug 30, 2016, at 02:16 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

>Given that something like this gets proposed from time to time, I
>wonder if it would make sense to actually write up (1) and (2) as a
>PEP that is immediately marked rejected. The PEP should make it clear
>*why* it is rejected. This would be a handy reference doc to have
>around the next time the idea comes up.

There certainly is precedence: e.g. PEPs 404 and 666. :)

Cheers,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20160830/a1481712/attachment.sig>