[Python-ideas] Rewriting the build system (part 2)

[Chris Barker]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ned Deily
>
>> This doesn't seem to me to be a winner takes all proposition -- there is
>> no reason someone couldn't set up a new build system for Python, get it
>> all working nicely on their platform(s) of choice, persuade others how
>> wonderful it is, get contributions, etc.
>>
>>
> This sounds really simple to me so when do you start work on it?


I think I was misunderstood -- my point was that there is no reason to
start all this with trying to persuade the python dev team to accept a new
build system up front.

The only possible way it could happen were if someone(s) did the work and
got a new system in place that worked well and proved to be better than
autoconf in various ways, while being just as capable. And that would be
LOT of work to get that far.

But it could be done without having to persuade anyone up front that it 's
a good idea.

Frankly, I doubt anyone's going to put that work in -- I know I won't --
remember that I'm one of the folks that's skeptical that this mythical
build system exists at all -- never mind the work to transition to it.

-Chris


-- 

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150316/f7ec1757/attachment.html>