[Python-ideas] What's going on with PEP 448 - Additional Unpacking Generalizations ?

[Joshua Landau]

On 20 January 2015 at 16:51, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, so: positional arguments neither follow keyword arguments nor keyword
> argument unpackings; iterable argument unpackings never follow keyword
> argument unpackings.

Yep. :)

Incidentally, this confusion was why I originally suggested the more
relaxed rules. It's probably not a problem for the end-user though,
because nobody does it. It would probably be fine from an
implementation perspective, too, now that I know how ast_for_call
works.