[Python-ideas] Idea: Named code blocks / inline module declarations

[David Mertz]

Why is this a misuse? Classes are largely just namespaces to start
with, and if you want to use them solely for that purpose, it's all
there for you.  If you wanted to make you intention even more
obviously, you could do something like:

>>> class NoInstance(object):
...     def __new__(cls):
...         raise NotImplementedError
...
>>> class signin(NoInstance):
...     def handle(*args):
...         print("Hello", args)
...
>>> signin()
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in __new__
NotImplementedError
>>> signin.handle('some','args','here')
Hello ('some', 'args', 'here')

Maybe some other name than NoInstance would be better: NamespaceOnly?
In any case, one helper class lets you use existing syntax exactly as
you desire.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
<tleeuwenburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I would prefer to avoid that just because it's a
> potential misuse of classes, and I suspect may lead to confusion for other
> developers. Otherwise that's exactly what I want to do.
>
> Cheers,
> -T
>
> On 17 September 2014 15:27, Ali Alkhatib <al2 at stanford.edu> wrote:
>>
>> This may be a misuse of classes, but why can't you make a class and then
>> not instantiate it?
>>
>>     class signin:
>>         def handle():
>>             return "this works"
>>
>>     signin.handle() # returns "this works"
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
>> <tleeuwenburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to be able to use named sections to organise my code, much
>>> an inline submodules, bit without using classes or functions to organise
>>> them. I would use this if I had a group of related functions which were not
>>> written in an object-oriented-style, possibly due to not needing any shared
>>> state. Rather than break these out into a new file, I would like to just be
>>> able to use internal structure to declare the relationship. I've used the
>>> keyword 'block' to indicate the start of a named block.
>>>
>>> For example,
>>>
>>> block signin:
>>>      def handle_new_user():
>>>            do_it()
>>>
>>>      def handle_existing_user():
>>>            do_it()
>>>
>>>
>>> while True:
>>>     try:
>>>         signin.handle_existing_user():
>>>     except:
>>>         signin.handle_new_user()
>>>
>>>     do_other_stuff()
>>>
>>> At the moment, I would have to either break out into more files, or
>>> somewhat clumsily co-opt things like functions or staticmethods. I think
>>> that supporting named blocks or inline module declarations would really help
>>> me organise some of my code much better. It could also provide a more
>>> seamless way to decide to break out into a new file. Once a named block got
>>> big enough, I could easily create a new file and import those functions into
>>> the same namespace.
>>>
>>> I hope this makes sense and that I'm not overlooking anything obvious.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Tennessee
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Python-ideas mailing list
>>> Python-ideas at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
>>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ali Alkhatib
>> Department of Computer Science
>> PhD Student - Stanford University
>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------
> Tennessee Leeuwenburg
> http://myownhat.blogspot.com/
> "Don't believe everything you think"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/



-- 
Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food
from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the
uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting
advocates of freedom in prisons.  Intellectual property is
to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th.