[Python-ideas] Is there a good reason to use * for multiplication?
Ram Rachum
ram.rachum at gmail.com
Fri Oct 12 22:27:41 CEST 2012
Hi everybody,
Today a funny thought occurred to me. Ever since I've learned to program
when I was a child, I've taken for granted that when programming, the sign
used for multiplication is *. But now that I think about it, why? Now that
we have Unicode, why not use · ?
Do you think that we can make Python support · in addition to *?
I can think of a couple of problems, but none of them seem like
deal-breakers:
- Backward compatibility: Python already uses *, but I don't see a
backward compatibility problem with supporting · additionally. Let people
use whichever they want, like spaces and tabs.
- Input methods: I personally use an IDE that could be easily set to
automatically convert * to · where appropriate and to allow manual input of
·. People on Linux can type Alt-. . Anyone else can set up a script that'll
let them type · using whichever keyboard combination they want. I admit
this is pretty annoying, but since you can always use * if you want to, I
figure that anyone who cares enough about using · instead of * (I bet that
people in scientific computing would like that) would be willing to take
the time to set it up.
What do you think?
Ram.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20121012/69377254/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list