[Python-ideas] itertools recipes: why not add them to the stdlib *somewhere*?

[wu wei]

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda at gmail.com>
 wrote:

> Are you saying the recipes are unsupported?
>

This is getting ridiculous. I'm not sure what is so controversial about not
wanting to scrape up every piece of crap code off the web that some lazy
coder can't be bothered to implement contextually and shove them into the
_standard library_. Are _you_ seriously saying that every one of those
random bits of code _is_ supported? That they will all be kept up to date
as the language evolves? That they won't turn into another module that
people complain is "stale"? Or another "why tkinter and not <x>" argument?

Every inclusion to the library adds overhead to finding and using elements
of the library.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20120710/3814f28c/attachment.html>