[Python-ideas] generic Ref class
Adam Atlas
adam at atlas.st
Sat Jan 12 21:16:02 CET 2008
On 12 Jan 2008, at 15:03, Aaron Brady wrote:
> Then:
>
> for x in refs( listA ):
> x.val+= 1
>
> Better than:
>
> for i, x in enumerate( listA ):
> listA[i]= x+ 1
Don't these do different things? The latter modifies the original
list, while the former, with your Ref class, apparently modifies (in a
by-reference sense) a new list that is thrown away once the for loop
is done.
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list