[Python-ideas] Positional only arguments

[Georg Brandl]

Aaron Brady schrieb:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: python-ideas-bounces at python.org [mailto:python-ideas-
>> bounces at python.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Brady
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:45 AM
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: python-ideas-bounces at python.org [mailto:python-ideas-
>> > bounces at python.org] On Behalf Of Ron Adam
>> >
>> >     def f(; a, b=2, c=3;):  No positional only, no keyword only
>> 
>> @f( 'k' )
>> 	def j( k ):
>> 		...
>> 
>> gets unwieldy and could show promise.  Cf. Steven's positional only
>> arguments decorator.
> 
> Cf. PEP 3102 Talin http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3102/
> Cf. PEP 3107 Winder and Lownds http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3107/
> Cf. PEP 3117 Brandl http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3117/
> 
> def f( @k, @j )
> 
> Half-way compromise to Brandl, only in declaration not in use, and always
> optional.

I'd prefer no compromises being made when it comes to PEP 3117.

Georg