[Python-Dev] Rejecting PEPs 407 and 413?

[Larry Hastings]

On 10/18/2012 08:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> With the 3.4 release PEP published using a traditional schedule,
> perhaps MvL would care to do the honours as BDFL-Delegate in rejecting
> the two "faster release cycle for the standard library" PEPs?
>
> (I know I asked to hold off on that when MvL last brought it up, but
> I've since realised that "do the first alpha early" isn't a
> stand-alone PEP, it's just a matter of convincing Larry it's
> worthwhile and negotiating timing with the release team after there
> are some release-worthy features on trunk)

FWIW I don't think those peps should be rejected simply because I didn't 
follow either for the 3.4 release schedule.  I think they should both 
have their day in the court of public opinion.  (Of course, maybe that 
day has already passed.)


//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121019/ad994db5/attachment.html>