[Python-Dev] sys.implementation
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu May 10 17:31:49 CEST 2012
On 5/10/2012 10:42 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 10.05.2012 10:57, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:33:14 +1000
>> Nick Coghlan<ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The original concern (that sys.implementation may differ in length
>>> across implementations) has been eliminated by moving all
>>> implementation specific values into sys.implementation.metadata.
>>
>> Uh. It's scary the kind of things people sometimes come up with :-)
>
> .oO( Namespaception )
>
>> sys.implementation.metadata looks like a completely over-engineered
>> concept. Please, let's just make sys.implementation a dict and stop
>> bothering about ordering and iterability.
Thank you for cutting through the knot.
> Agreed.
Ditto. Iterability is good and should be part of all python collections.
People who want a sorted representation should just use sorted(d.items)
as with other sortable mappings. Nick's idea of prefixing local
implementation keys with '_' would nicely group them together on sorted
displays.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list