[Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Tue Aug 28 06:57:05 CEST 2012
Petri Lehtinen writes:
> Daniel Holth wrote:
> > I don't know of a tool that doesn't reliably ignore extra fields, but
> > I will put you down as being in favor of an X- fields paragraph:
> >
> > Extensions (X- Fields)
> > ::::::::::::::::::::::
> >
> > Metadata files can contain fields that are not part of
> > the specification, called *extensions*. These fields start with
> > with `X-`.
>
> See RFC 6648 for why such X-fields may not be a good idea:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
But note that the RFC also says that the preferred solution to the
problem that X-fields are intended to solve is an easily accessible
name registry and a simple registration procedure. If Martin's "be
prepared for a ten-year period to acceptance" is serious, what should
be done about such a registry?
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list