[Python-Dev] PEP 384 status

[Nick Coghlan]

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> Maybe I've missed your answer, but what would prevent the "inline"
> solution from working?

Only PEP 7 (since standard support for inline is a C99 feature)

On the other hand, if gcc (including cygwin/mingw) and MSVC support it
(even with non-standard spellings), then that objection probably
doesn't matter.

> (a macro with the result-as-a-pointer is quite ugly)
Agreed.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia