[Python-Dev] Cycle collection enhancement idea

eyal.lotem+pyutils@gmail.com eyal.lotem at gmail.com
Sun Jun 29 16:12:40 CEST 2008


On Jun 29, 3:36 pm, Antoine Pitrou <solip... at pitrou.net> wrote:
> eyal.lotem+pyutils <at> gmail.com <eyal.lotem <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> > That would be no worse than what happens now - but its still not
> > perfect (__del__ ordering issues). Also, you would need to temporarily
> > revive the cycles as mentioned above (to avoid accessibility of
> > partially destructed objects).
>
> The idea is to call all __del__'s *before* any object in the cycle is
> deallocated (that is, call them manually rather than as part of deallocating
> them). That way you shouldn't have the issues mentioned above.

Firstly, as I said above: you will still have __del__ ordering issues.
Secondly, the destructor itself currently calls __del__, so if you
call __del__ before any deallocation, it will get called again as part
of the deallocation.  Might be a technicality but it will still
probably require some code restructuring to work around (or making
that code even more hairy).

> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-... at python.orghttp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev2-garchiv...


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list