[Python-Dev] Checking in a broken test was: Re: [Python-checkins]r41940 - python/trunk/Lib/test/test_compiler.py
Scott David Daniels
Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org
Sat Jan 14 05:22:49 CET 2006
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Scott David Daniels wrote:
>> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/466288
>
> my main nit is the name: the test isn't broken in itself, and doesn't need
> to be fixed; it's just not expected to succeed at this time.
>
> the usual term for this is "expected failure" (sometimes called XFAIL).
Would "expect_fail", "expect_failure", "expected_fail", or
"expected_failure",
work for you?
If so, could you rank them? I don't get anything from "xfail", and I'm
not sure others will either.
--Scott David Daniels
Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list