[Python-Dev] Why both r'' and R'', u'' and U''?
M.-A. Lemburg
mal@lemburg.com
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:53:03 +0100
Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
>
> Sorry i'm being forgetful -- could someone please refresh my memory:
>
> Was there a good reason for allowing both lowercase and capital 'r'
> as a prefix for raw-strings? I assume that the availability of both
> r'' and R'' is what led to having both u'' and U''.
Right.
> Is there any
> good reason for that either?
No idea... I have never used anything other than the lowercase
versions.
> This just seems to lead to ambiguity and unneeded complexity:
> more cases in tokenize.py, more cases in tokenize.c, more work
> for IDLE, more annoying when searching for u' in your editor.
> (I was about to fix the lack of u'' support in tokenize.py and
> that made me think about this.)
>
> What happened to TOOWTDI?
>
> Would you believe we now have 36 different ways of starting a string:
>
> ' " ''' """
> r' r" r''' r"""
> u' u" u''' u"""
> ur' ur" ur''' ur"""
> R' R" R''' R"""
> U' U" U''' U"""
> uR' uR" uR''' uR"""
> Ur' Ur" Ur''' Ur"""
> UR' UR" UR''' UR"""
>
> Would it be outrageous to suggest deprecating the last five rows?
No. + 1 on the idea.
> -- ?!ng
>
> [1] We started with 4. Perl has (by my count) 381 ways of starting
> a string literal, so we're halfway there, logarithmically speaking.
> Perl has 757 if you count the fancier operators qx, qw, s, and tr.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Company: http://www.egenix.com/
Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/