[python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP

Victor Stinner vstinner at redhat.com
Mon Nov 5 17:08:42 EST 2018


Le sam. 3 nov. 2018 à 10:39, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> a écrit :
> > I'm unhappy with the "[] Further discussion" choice. We have a
> > governance crisis. Many people would like to see it resolved as soon
> > as possible, I don't see the ability to vote for "[] Further
> > discussion" as a way to resolve this crisis.
>
> Why are you worried?  If many people would like to see the "crisis" (I
> would call it a void) resolved early, then probably "Further discussion"
> won't win.  So how is its presence a problem?

PEPs cannot be approved since July. It seems like we will not be able
to approve PEPs before January, even if a governance PEP is approved
and a new council/committee/whatever is elected.

There was a discussion abouge BDFL-delegate for Jeroen Demeyer's PEP
580 which has been somehow blocked (sorry, I didn't follow closely the
discussion, so I'm not sure of the outcome).

I would prefer the situation to be unblocked as soon as possible to
unblock Python 3.8. Otherwise, Python 3.8 will be the release of the
governance crisis with no large new features.

I know that at least two core developers have pending PEPs that they
didn't publish because there is nobody to approve PEPs.

Victor


More information about the python-committers mailing list