[python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO

[Christian Heimes]

On 2017-05-02 20:28, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/2/2017 10:07 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 May 2017 09:36:02 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal at egenix.com>
>> wrote:
> 
>>> IMO, it's much easier for everyone to just always point people
>>> to BPO for discussions and keep PRs reserved for code reviews.
>>
>> I agree with Mark-Andre here.  It will take effort on our part to
>> make our culture be "discuss on BPO", but it will produce a much
>> superior history to what github PRs produce, so I think it is worth it.
> 
> It would easier to move discussion to bpo if there were a clickable link
> from PR to bpo, just as there is in the opposite direction.  I believe
> that there is a workflow issue to add this, but last I knew, it was
> bogged down in where to put the link, or something.

All recent PRs have a clickable link to BPO. It's in the box with CI
results. Click on "Details" for "bedevere/issue-number".

Christian