[python-committers] Commit right for Vajrasky Kok?

[Ethan Furman]

On 01/09/2014 07:34 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:23:59 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>>
>> Vajrasky Kok is good candidate. He is very active and interested in Python
>> maintaining, he is respondable. he makes review of others code. But his code
>> still not mature. He is often doesn't noticed many details in first versions of
>> his patches. He just lacks experience. I believe that a year late he will be
>> more experienced.
>>
>> Sorry, I'm -0.1 for right now.
>
> I agree with this assessment.  It might not take a year, but I don't
> think the time is quite yet.  Please feel free to encourage him, though.
>
> To put Serhiy's summary another way, we haven't quite reached the point
> where it would be easier for us if he could just commit his own patches.

I agree with the above.  Promising, but not ready yet.

Also, on another thread I wrote:
>
> More seriously, I would say a core-dev should also be teachable, able
> to communicate effectively, and good at debugging, to name just a few
> things.

This sentence was meant in general, not that Vajrasky doesn't have them.  I would say he is good at communicating and 
debugging, it's just the quality of the patches that keeps me from voting for him at this point.

--
~Ethan~