[python-committers] clinic churn after beta2

[Eli Bendersky]

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> On mar., 2014-01-07 at 13:18 -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does it really make sense to introduce large amounts of code churn
> > after the release of 3.4 beta2? It started innocently enough, but now
> > it seems that the whole implementation is being reconsidered
> > (Antoine's email to pydev). This doesn't look like something we should
> > be doing so late in the release process.
> >
> > Are we really that much in need of convert-to-clinic *now*?
>
> I guess the question is: are there large enough benefits to be reaped
> for risking the release (a bit)?
> There's no question Argument Clinic can bring interesting benefits, it's
> just a question of timing.
>

Just to be clear, this is exactly what I mean. I'm not saying AC is not
worth it; I'm questioning the timing.

Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20140107/9a5ab844/attachment.html>