From brian.curtin at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 01:28:08 2011 From: brian.curtin at gmail.com (Brian Curtin) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:08 -0500 Subject: [python-committers] 3.2.1 rc 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 13:33, Georg Brandl wrote: > As I've already said in another thread, I plan for 3.2.1 r2 as soon as > http://bugs.python.org/issue12084 is fixed. This is hopefully this > weekend, but may be next. Final is, as always, one week later. > > Georg Sorry for taking so long to finish it, but I now have a patch completed for #12084. It's Windows specific so I don't imagine there are a lot of interested reviewers, but at least a quick look to make sure I'm not doing anything too crazy would be greatly appreciated so Georg and the crew and get on with the release process. The full test suite passes, but keep in mind that symlinks on Windows require administrator privileges. My build slave is the only one which runs as admin and it's not currently running very well. Now that I fixed this bug, I'll get the bot back up and running. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From g.brandl at gmx.net Fri Jun 3 17:39:49 2011 From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:39:49 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] 3.2.1 rc 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 06/03/11 01:28, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 13:33, Georg Brandl > wrote: > > As I've already said in another thread, I plan for 3.2.1 r2 as soon as > http://bugs.python.org/issue12084 is fixed. This is hopefully this > weekend, but may be next. Final is, as always, one week later. > > Georg > > > Sorry for taking so long to finish it, but I now have a patch completed for > #12084. It's Windows specific so I don't imagine there are a lot of interested > reviewers, but at least a quick look to make sure I'm not doing anything too > crazy would be greatly appreciated so Georg and the crew and get on with the > release process. > > The full test suite passes, but keep in mind that symlinks on Windows require > administrator privileges. My build slave is the only one which runs as admin and > it's not currently running very well. Now that I fixed this bug, I'll get the > bot back up and running. Good timing... I'm just leaving for vacation :) I am not certain, but if all goes as planned I might still have some time between this and next weekend to get out a rc2, and reserve the weekend of the 18th/19th for the final. I'll put that in the release calendar for now. cheers, Georg From barry at python.org Fri Jun 3 17:53:46 2011 From: barry at python.org (Barry Warsaw) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:53:46 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] 2.6.7 final today Message-ID: <20110603115346.29cdb153@neurotica.wooz.org> I plan on releasing Python 2.6.7 as scheduled today. I see no showstopper bugs, but do feel free to ping me on irc if you know of any reason to delay the release. I probably won't start on it for several hours yet. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rdmurray at bitdance.com Thu Jun 9 03:43:39 2011 From: rdmurray at bitdance.com (R. David Murray) Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:43:39 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch Message-ID: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of an IOError if the file is closed. That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not appropriate for the RC stage. Is is that the NEWS section hasn't been updated? Or, Georg, are you going to sort out the stuff you really put into RC2 from the other stuff after you release RC2? I'm not committing anything right now because it just isn't clear to me how all of this is working, so for me it's as if we have a freeze just like we had with our SVN procedures. (The 2.7 branch, on the other hand, looks as I would expect, with the section header referring to 2.7.3.) -- R. David Murray http://www.bitdance.com From benjamin at python.org Thu Jun 9 04:26:35 2011 From: benjamin at python.org (Benjamin Peterson) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:26:35 -0500 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> Message-ID: 2011/6/8 R. David Murray : > I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. ?My understanding > is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg > is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have > a freeze in the main repo. ?All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS > file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", > yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be > going in to release candidate 2. ?As an arbitrary example, take: > > ? ?- Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of > ? ? ?an IOError if the file is closed. > > That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not > appropriate for the RC stage. > > Is is that the NEWS section hasn't been updated? ?Or, Georg, are you > going to sort out the stuff you really put into RC2 from the other stuff > after you release RC2? See af715726d911 It looks like Georg has been merging the 3.2.1 release branch to the 3.2 branch and people are blindly adding to the news section. That stuff should probably just be relocated. -- Regards, Benjamin From steve at holdenweb.com Thu Jun 9 05:11:10 2011 From: steve at holdenweb.com (Steve Holden) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:11:10 +0100 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> Message-ID: <1CD0156A-8B1C-48F0-946E-FDA1A7D41A25@holdenweb.com> "Blindly" never sounds good. Just sayin'. regards Steve On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:26 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2011/6/8 R. David Murray : >> I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding >> is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg >> is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have >> a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS >> file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", >> yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be >> going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: >> >> - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of >> an IOError if the file is closed. >> >> That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not >> appropriate for the RC stage. >> >> Is is that the NEWS section hasn't been updated? Or, Georg, are you >> going to sort out the stuff you really put into RC2 from the other stuff >> after you release RC2? > > See af715726d911 It looks like Georg has been merging the 3.2.1 > release branch to the 3.2 branch and people are blindly adding to the > news section. That stuff should probably just be relocated. > > > -- > Regards, > Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers -- Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nad at acm.org Thu Jun 9 06:29:21 2011 From: nad at acm.org (Ned Deily) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:29:21 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> Message-ID: <5FA50C13-338E-4D60-90C8-93429A709944@acm.org> On Jun 8, 2011, at 18:43 , R. David Murray wrote: > I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding > is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg > is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have > a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS > file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", > yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be > going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: > > - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of > an IOError if the file is closed. > > That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not > appropriate for the RC stage. Georg announced earlier that rc1 is dead so anything is allowed into rc2: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.committers/1677 -- Ned Deily nad at acm.org -- [] From g.brandl at gmx.net Thu Jun 9 08:13:26 2011 From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:13:26 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> Message-ID: On 06/09/11 03:43, R. David Murray wrote: > I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding > is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg > is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have > a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS > file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", > yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be > going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: > > - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of > an IOError if the file is closed. > > That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not > appropriate for the RC stage. > > Is is that the NEWS section hasn't been updated? Or, Georg, are you > going to sort out the stuff you really put into RC2 from the other stuff > after you release RC2? > > I'm not committing anything right now because it just isn't clear to me > how all of this is working, so for me it's as if we have a freeze just > like we had with our SVN procedures. > > (The 2.7 branch, on the other hand, looks as I would expect, with > the section header referring to 2.7.3.) Since there is such a long timespan between rc1 and rc2, and rc1 normall is the first and only prerelease anyway, I've decided to allow all fixes into rc2. So just commit as usual. Georg From rdmurray at bitdance.com Thu Jun 9 17:42:58 2011 From: rdmurray at bitdance.com (R. David Murray) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:42:58 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: <5FA50C13-338E-4D60-90C8-93429A709944@acm.org> References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> <5FA50C13-338E-4D60-90C8-93429A709944@acm.org> Message-ID: <20110609154259.40BF32505A3@webabinitio.net> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:29:21 -0700, Ned Deily wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 18:43 , R. David Murray wrote: > > > I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding > > is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg > > is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have > > a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS > > file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", > > yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be > > going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: > > > > - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of > > an IOError if the file is closed. > > > > That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not > > appropriate for the RC stage. > > Georg announced earlier that rc1 is dead so anything is allowed into rc2: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.committers/1677 Ah, thank you. I must have misunderstood that when I read it the first time (I do have a vague memory of reading it). I will just translate "rc2" to "rc1" in my head and solder on :) I still does make the NEWS history look weird, though. -- R. David Murray http://www.bitdance.com From g.brandl at gmx.net Thu Jun 9 19:46:25 2011 From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:46:25 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: <20110609154259.40BF32505A3@webabinitio.net> References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> <5FA50C13-338E-4D60-90C8-93429A709944@acm.org> <20110609154259.40BF32505A3@webabinitio.net> Message-ID: On 06/09/11 17:42, R. David Murray wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:29:21 -0700, Ned Deily wrote: >> >> On Jun 8, 2011, at 18:43 , R. David Murray wrote: >> >> > I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding >> > is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg >> > is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have >> > a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS >> > file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", >> > yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be >> > going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: >> > >> > - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of >> > an IOError if the file is closed. >> > >> > That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not >> > appropriate for the RC stage. >> >> Georg announced earlier that rc1 is dead so anything is allowed into rc2: >> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.committers/1677 > > Ah, thank you. I must have misunderstood that when I read it the first > time (I do have a vague memory of reading it). I will just translate > "rc2" to "rc1" in my head and solder on :) > > I still does make the NEWS history look weird, though. Why? All the new stuff is under "new in 3.2.1rc2" which is correct. Georg From rdmurray at bitdance.com Thu Jun 9 20:32:52 2011 From: rdmurray at bitdance.com (R. David Murray) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:32:52 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] state of the 3.2 branch In-Reply-To: References: <20110609014340.6F0A4250516@webabinitio.net> <5FA50C13-338E-4D60-90C8-93429A709944@acm.org> <20110609154259.40BF32505A3@webabinitio.net> Message-ID: <20110609183253.551992505A3@webabinitio.net> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:46:25 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: > On 06/09/11 17:42, R. David Murray wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:29:21 -0700, Ned Deily wrote: > >> > >> On Jun 8, 2011, at 18:43 , R. David Murray wrote: > >> > >> > I am completely confused by the state of the 3.2 branch. My understanding > >> > is that RC1 has been released, that RC2 is coming soon, and that Georg > >> > is releasing 3.2.1 from a separate clone so that we do not have to have > >> > a freeze in the main repo. All that is fine, but the main repo NEWS > >> > file is headed by "What's New in Python 3.2.1 Release candidate 2?", > >> > yet there are clearly news items in that section that should not be > >> > going in to release candidate 2. As an arbitrary example, take: > >> > > >> > - Issue #12175: FileIO.readall() now raises a ValueError instead of > >> > an IOError if the file is closed. > >> > > >> > That seems to me to be clearly not a critical fix, and thus not > >> > appropriate for the RC stage. > >> > >> Georg announced earlier that rc1 is dead so anything is allowed into rc2: > >> > >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.committers/1677 > > > > Ah, thank you. I must have misunderstood that when I read it the first > > time (I do have a vague memory of reading it). I will just translate > > "rc2" to "rc1" in my head and solder on :) > > > > I still does make the NEWS history look weird, though. > > Why? All the new stuff is under "new in 3.2.1rc2" which is correct. Yeah, but that stuff isn't the kind of stuff you'd normally see in an RC2. That's what I meant by weird :). It's not a big deal. -- R. David Murray http://www.bitdance.com From merwok at netwok.org Fri Jun 10 19:57:32 2011 From: merwok at netwok.org (=?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:57:32 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories Message-ID: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> Hi, If someone has a cpython clone with a clean changeset that fixes a bug or adds a feature, is there any reason not to pull it and push it to the main repo? It would save getting and applying the patch manually. Regards From solipsis at pitrou.net Fri Jun 10 20:00:47 2011 From: solipsis at pitrou.net (Antoine Pitrou) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:00:47 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> Message-ID: <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 ? 19:57 +0200, ?ric Araujo a ?crit : > Hi, > > If someone has a cpython clone with a clean changeset that fixes a bug > or adds a feature, is there any reason not to pull it and push it to the > main repo? It would save getting and applying the patch manually. You usually want to add a Misc/NEWS message or an ACKS entry, or make a cosmetic change to the patch. (in other words, "there's no such thing as a clean changeset" :-)) Regards Antoine. From ncoghlan at gmail.com Sat Jun 11 11:24:28 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:24:28 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 ? 19:57 +0200, ?ric Araujo a ?crit : >> Hi, >> >> If someone has a cpython clone with a clean changeset that fixes a bug >> or adds a feature, is there any reason not to pull it and push it to the >> main repo? ?It would save getting and applying the patch manually. > > You usually want to add a Misc/NEWS message or an ACKS entry, or make a > cosmetic change to the patch. > (in other words, "there's no such thing as a clean changeset" :-)) Until mercurial has better tools to bundle multiple changesets into a single coherent group of changes, it's still preferable to do the export/import dance. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From benjamin at python.org Sat Jun 11 17:01:37 2011 From: benjamin at python.org (Benjamin Peterson) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:01:37 -0500 Subject: [python-committers] 2.7.2 and 3.1.4 tagged Message-ID: Hi, 2.7.2 and 3.1.4 have been tagged (in the main repo) and are ready for binary building. Thanks, Benjamin From martin at v.loewis.de Sun Jun 12 13:59:58 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:59:58 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> > Until mercurial has better tools to bundle multiple changesets into a > single coherent group of changes, it's still preferable to do the > export/import dance. Why did we migrate to Mercurial, then? Regards, Martin From ncoghlan at gmail.com Sun Jun 12 15:03:05 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:03:05 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:59 PM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> Until mercurial has better tools to bundle multiple changesets into a >> single coherent group of changes, it's still preferable to do the >> export/import dance. > > Why did we migrate to Mercurial, then? The merge tools are still better and keeping out-of-tree branches up to date is significantly easier. The fact that bringing external changes *in* to the tree still requires going through the patch process as it did with SVN is just an artefact of our desire to keep the history of the central repo relatively clean and python-checkins at least somewhat readable. It's also possible that we should be encouraging greater use of Mercurial Queues [1] and making them an official part of our development process. After all, their stated purpose is to allow changes to be developed incrementally, but only landed in the official history as a single consolidated changeset. Since that's the behaviour we want, we should probably consider using the tool that is designed to provide it. [1] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From ncoghlan at gmail.com Sun Jun 12 15:05:39 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:05:39 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > [1] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension Arguably better link: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqTutorial Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From martin at v.loewis.de Sun Jun 12 16:01:36 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:01:36 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <4DF4C6C0.5070809@v.loewis.de> > It's also possible that we should be encouraging greater use of > Mercurial Queues [1] and making them an official part of our > development process. Can you publish/push a patch queue to a remote repository? Regards, Martin From ncoghlan at gmail.com Sun Jun 12 18:05:13 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:05:13 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: <4DF4C6C0.5070809@v.loewis.de> References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> <4DF4C6C0.5070809@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:01 AM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> It's also possible that we should be encouraging greater use of >> Mercurial Queues [1] and making them an official part of our >> development process. > > Can you publish/push a patch queue to a remote repository? bitbucket certainly lets you maintain a patch as a queue rather than as a separate clone. I ran across it in the context of the Py3k port of the PEP 380 patch: https://bitbucket.org/rndblnch/cpython-pep380/overview I don't have the personal experience to say how easy patch queues are to share in general (if nothing else, they're designed to be easy to export and import as ordinary patches for distribution that way). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From nad at acm.org Sun Jun 12 19:14:29 2011 From: nad at acm.org (Ned Deily) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:14:29 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: In article , Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:59 PM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > >> Until mercurial has better tools to bundle multiple changesets into a > >> single coherent group of changes, it's still preferable to do the > >> export/import dance. > > Why did we migrate to Mercurial, then? > The merge tools are still better and keeping out-of-tree branches up > to date is significantly easier. The fact that bringing external > changes *in* to the tree still requires going through the patch > process as it did with SVN is just an artefact of our desire to keep > the history of the central repo relatively clean and python-checkins > at least somewhat readable. It seems to me that we are making life overly difficult for ourselves in at least one respect: the updating of the NEWS and ACKS files. Because most revisions are modifying one or both of these files, you are almost guaranteed to have a merge conflict and often multiple merge conflicts, since both files differ from branch to branch. There are several ways we could eliminate this needless pain. Probably the simplest would be to agree on a simple format for including the NEWS and ACK info in the hg commit message and then agree on a process to batch update the NEWS and ACK files from the commit messages prior to each release. Commit messages today often duplicate the NEWS file entry anyway. What's missing is a way to identify which section of the NEWS file to add the message to and a standard form to identify an ACK. I'm sure we could come up with something simple that would be acceptable and that would cover merges (i.e. like duplicating the commit message on a merge). For pulling changes from another repo where the commit messages were not in the proper format, either a separate change to capture the NEWS could be pushed. Or, prior to pushing a set of related repo patches, one could use Mercurial Queues to "edit" the commit messages. hg conveniently maps commit messages to patch header comments. So you should be able to pop each revision as a patch (hg qimport -r tip; hg qpop) then edit each patch header/commit message (hg qpush; hg qrefresh -e ; hg qfinish) prior to pushing to the main repo. (That will, of course, result in new revision ids and new history and cannot be done once the revisions are "in the wild".) Even if the batch updates were totally manual, I think a couple of hours once a release would be a worthy tradeoff if it helped to lower the barrier for getting fixes in. -- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org From benjamin at python.org Sun Jun 12 20:01:30 2011 From: benjamin at python.org (Benjamin Peterson) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:01:30 -0500 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: 2011/6/12 Ned Deily : > There are several ways we could eliminate this needless pain. ?Probably > the simplest would be to agree on a simple format for including the NEWS > and ACK info in the hg commit message and then agree on a process to > batch update the NEWS and ACK files from the commit messages prior to > each release. The problem with this method is that spelling can't be fixed and messages can't be reformatted or expanded. Another method would be to write a extension for Mercurial which is "smart" about the format of Misc/NEWS and could do the resolution automatically. -- Regards, Benjamin From merwok at netwok.org Sun Jun 12 20:32:03 2011 From: merwok at netwok.org (=?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:32:03 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories In-Reply-To: References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <4DF50623.4020707@netwok.org> Le 12/06/2011 20:01, Benjamin Peterson a ?crit : > Another method would be to write a extension for Mercurial which is > "smart" about the format of Misc/NEWS and could do the resolution > automatically. Even easier than an extension: a merge tool, i.e. a script that knows how to parse the file and compare three versions of it. From nad at acm.org Sun Jun 12 20:43:05 2011 From: nad at acm.org (Ned Deily) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:43:05 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] Pulling from contributors repositories References: <4DF25B0C.2000207@netwok.org> <1307728847.3653.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4DF4AA3E.1070302@v.loewis.de> <4DF50623.4020707@netwok.org> Message-ID: In article <4DF50623.4020707 at netwok.org>, ?ric Araujo wrote: > Le 12/06/2011 20:01, Benjamin Peterson a ?crit : > > Another method would be to write a extension for Mercurial which is > > "smart" about the format of Misc/NEWS and could do the resolution > > automatically. > Even easier than an extension: a merge tool, i.e. a script that knows > how to parse the file and compare three versions of it. Of course a merge tool helps. ?But merge conflicts do add to the complexity of the process for many people and the current NEWS update policy pretty much ensures there will be conflicts even when the code changes do not cause any conflicts. Why not lower the barrier? Another, more complicated way would be to use a hook to store each commit message as a separate file in a Misc/NEWS.d directory. ?Then the separate files could be periodically rolled up into the singe NEWS file. That would allow for post-push editing by the committer. -- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org From patcam at python.org Mon Jun 13 20:18:22 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:18:22 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] (no subject) Message-ID: -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From larry at hastings.org Tue Jun 14 04:36:05 2011 From: larry at hastings.org (Larry Hastings) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:36:05 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] Call For Topics for Python Language Summit at EuroPython 2011 Message-ID: <4DF6C915.50803@hastings.org> Howdy howdy. Michael Foord can't make it to EuroPython this year--and congratulations to him on his new baby!--so he's asked me to chair the Python Language Summit in his stead. Although I have some suggested topics from Michael, I don't have any burning issues of my own to add to the docket. That's where *you* come in. If you have a topic you'd like to suggest, please email it privately to me (larry at hastings dot org) along with an estimate of how long you think it'll take to discuss. Please have all suggestions to me no later than Friday June 17th. Also, please include the phrase "Python Language Summit" in the subject line, in case it gets caught in my spam filters. You don't have to be attending the summit to suggest a topic--I'll consider suggestions from anybody. Hope to see you at EuroPython, /larry/ From patcam at python.org Thu Jun 16 19:10:44 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:10:44 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] Fwd: SF-Board] Python / WDAS Contributor Agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Please see contributor agreement in the attachment. Pat ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pat Campbell Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:52 PM Subject: SF-Board] Python / WDAS Contributor Agreement To: janet.noda at disney.com Cc: VanL , PSF Board Hi Janet: Please see the attached & signed contributor agreement between the Python Software Foundation and Walt Disney Animation Studios. If you need anything else, please let us know. Thanks, Pat -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WDAS-Andy Hendrickson-CA-'11.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 730204 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mal at egenix.com Thu Jun 16 19:18:45 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:18:45 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Python language summit on ustream.tv Message-ID: <4DFA3AF5.3050306@egenix.com> Dear Python Developers, for the upcoming language summit at EuroPython, I'd like to try out whether streaming such meetings would work. I'll setup a webcam and stream the event live to a private channel on ustream.tv. These are the details in case you want to watch: URL: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/python-language-summit PWD: fpmUtuL4 Date: Sunday, 2011-06-19 Time: 10:00 - 16:00 CEST with breaks I'm not sure whether I can stream the whole summit, but at least the morning session should be possible, provided the network works on that day. Interaction will likely be a bit difficult in case we have heated discussions :-), but we'll keep the IRC channel #python-language-summit on freenode open as well. Thanks, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 16 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ 2011-05-23: Released eGenix mx Base 3.2.0 http://python.egenix.com/ 2011-05-25: Released mxODBC 3.1.1 http://python.egenix.com/ 2011-06-20: EuroPython 2011, Florence, Italy 4 days to go ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From solipsis at pitrou.net Thu Jun 16 19:42:48 2011 From: solipsis at pitrou.net (Antoine Pitrou) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:42:48 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] Contributor Agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1308246168.3643.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hello, As a side note, I sent my contributor agreement between 2 or 3 years ago (I don't remember exactly) but I still appear on the bug tracker as if it hadn't been received: http://bugs.python.org/user2040 Is there some lag in synchronizing this information? (of course, I refrained from making the change myself) Regards Antoine. Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 ? 13:10 -0400, Pat Campbell a ?crit : > Please see contributor agreement in the attachment. > > Pat > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pat Campbell > Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:52 PM > Subject: SF-Board] Python / WDAS Contributor Agreement > To: janet.noda at disney.com > Cc: VanL , PSF Board > > > Hi Janet: > > Please see the attached & signed contributor agreement between the > Python Software Foundation and Walt Disney Animation Studios. > > If you need anything else, please let us know. > > Thanks, > Pat > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam at python.org > > > > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam at python.org > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers From patcam at python.org Thu Jun 16 22:17:27 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:17:27 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] Contributor Agreement In-Reply-To: <1308246168.3643.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1308246168.3643.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi Antoine: Your contributor agreement may have been misplaced during the transition and exchange of PSF files and records from one PSF Secretary to the other. Therefore, I am unable to locate your contributor agreement. Could you please sign and email or fax (+l 858-712-8966) another? I can then update your information in the bug tracker. Thanks, Pat On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > As a side note, I sent my contributor agreement between 2 or 3 years ago > (I don't remember exactly) but I still appear on the bug tracker as if > it hadn't been received: > http://bugs.python.org/user2040 > > Is there some lag in synchronizing this information? > (of course, I refrained from making the change myself) > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 ? 13:10 -0400, Pat Campbell a ?crit : > > Please see contributor agreement in the attachment. > > > > Pat > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Pat Campbell > > Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:52 PM > > Subject: SF-Board] Python / WDAS Contributor Agreement > > To: janet.noda at disney.com > > Cc: VanL , PSF Board > > > > > > Hi Janet: > > > > Please see the attached & signed contributor agreement between the > > Python Software Foundation and Walt Disney Animation Studios. > > > > If you need anything else, please let us know. > > > > Thanks, > > Pat > > > > -- > > Pat Campbell > > PSF Administrator/Secretary > > patcam at python.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Pat Campbell > > PSF Administrator/Secretary > > patcam at python.org > > _______________________________________________ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Tue Jun 28 20:49:34 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:49:34 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Grubert: Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. Pat Campbell PSF Secretary On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:02 AM, engelbert gruber < engelbert.gruber at gmail.com> wrote: > hello, > > on bugs and pypi it is user grubert, alternate email > grubert at users.sourceforge.net > > all the best > engelbert > > -- > http://darefoot.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Board mailing list > PSF-Board at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board > > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Tue Jun 28 21:15:34 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:15:34 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Engelbert: Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to pull up your profile information with the following information: user name: gruber Real name: Engelbert Gruber I am unable to gain access to your tracker profile. So, maybe you can try accessing your profile and/or send me more information so that I can add your contributor agreement to the tracker. Thanks, Pat On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Hi Grubert: > > Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. > > Pat Campbell > PSF Secretary > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:02 AM, engelbert gruber < > engelbert.gruber at gmail.com> wrote: > >> hello, >> >> on bugs and pypi it is user grubert, alternate email >> grubert at users.sourceforge.net >> >> all the best >> engelbert >> >> -- >> http://darefoot.blogspot.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PSF-Board mailing list >> PSF-Board at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board >> >> > > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam at python.org > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ncoghlan at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 09:06:31 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:06:31 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Hi Engelbert: > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > pull up your profile information with the following information: > > user name: gruber I believe the original email indicated the username was 'grubert' (the above is missing the final 't') Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From neologix at free.fr Wed Jun 29 09:09:30 2011 From: neologix at free.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Charles=2DFran=E7ois_Natali?=) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:09:30 +0200 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to "No"). Should I send it again? cf 2011/6/28 Pat Campbell : > Hi Engelbert: > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > pull up your profile information with the following information: > > user name: gruber > Real name: Engelbert Gruber > > I am unable to gain access to your tracker profile. So, maybe you can > try accessing your profile and/or send me more information so that I > can add your contributor agreement to the tracker. > > Thanks, > Pat > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: >> >> Hi Grubert: >> >> Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. >> >> Pat Campbell >> PSF Secretary >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:02 AM, engelbert gruber >> wrote: >>> >>> hello, >>> >>> on bugs and pypi it is user grubert, alternate email >>> grubert at users.sourceforge.net >>> >>> all the best >>> ?engelbert >>> >>> -- >>> http://darefoot.blogspot.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PSF-Board mailing list >>> PSF-Board at python.org >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Pat Campbell >> PSF Administrator/Secretary >> patcam at python.org > > > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam at python.org > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > From ncoghlan at gmail.com Wed Jun 29 09:17:31 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:17:31 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/6/29 Charles-Fran?ois Natali : > Hi, > > Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker > profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to > "No"). > Should I send it again? Yours was recent enough that it should be on file (the misplacement of some of the forms happened quite some time ago). Pat, could you check the contributor status for "neologix", please? Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From steve at holdenweb.com Wed Jun 29 09:17:43 2011 From: steve at holdenweb.com (Steve Holden) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:17:43 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <939D05AF-753A-4EB3-BA9B-89C7BBB26067@holdenweb.com> That would be a good idea. In fact any developer who feels they should have the commit-bit enabled but don't should also question whether we received their contributor agreement. It *is* important for the Foundation to hold all agreements on file, since that way we can (we would hope) establish the provenance of all Python code. That's important, because we are relying on the contributor license assignment to give us the right to re-license contributor code to other people under *our* choice of license. regards Steve On Jun 29, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Charles-Fran?ois Natali wrote: > Hi, > > Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker > profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to > "No"). > Should I send it again? > > cf > > > 2011/6/28 Pat Campbell : >> Hi Engelbert: >> >> Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to >> pull up your profile information with the following information: >> >> user name: gruber >> Real name: Engelbert Gruber >> >> I am unable to gain access to your tracker profile. So, maybe you can >> try accessing your profile and/or send me more information so that I >> can add your contributor agreement to the tracker. >> >> Thanks, >> Pat >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: >>> >>> Hi Grubert: >>> >>> Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. >>> >>> Pat Campbell >>> PSF Secretary >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:02 AM, engelbert gruber >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> hello, >>>> >>>> on bugs and pypi it is user grubert, alternate email >>>> grubert at users.sourceforge.net >>>> >>>> all the best >>>> engelbert >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://darefoot.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PSF-Board mailing list >>>> PSF-Board at python.org >>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pat Campbell >>> PSF Administrator/Secretary >>> patcam at python.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Pat Campbell >> PSF Administrator/Secretary >> patcam at python.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> >> > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers -- Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve at holdenweb.com Wed Jun 29 09:20:24 2011 From: steve at holdenweb.com (Steve Holden) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:20:24 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3D1E379F-55BA-49EA-B3D1-CB0F80B9EBBC@holdenweb.com> PS; Please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. Now the PSF administrator is able to handle database updates this should be an increasingly infrequent requirement. We appreciate developers helping us (the PSF) to jump through the necessary hoops to make sure that all legal t's are crossed and i's dotted. regards Steve On Jun 29, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Charles-Fran?ois Natali wrote: > Hi, > > Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker > profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to > "No"). > Should I send it again? > > cf > > > 2011/6/28 Pat Campbell : >> Hi Engelbert: >> >> Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to >> pull up your profile information with the following information: >> >> user name: gruber >> Real name: Engelbert Gruber >> >> I am unable to gain access to your tracker profile. So, maybe you can >> try accessing your profile and/or send me more information so that I >> can add your contributor agreement to the tracker. >> >> Thanks, >> Pat >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: >>> >>> Hi Grubert: >>> >>> Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. >>> >>> Pat Campbell >>> PSF Secretary >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:02 AM, engelbert gruber >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> hello, >>>> >>>> on bugs and pypi it is user grubert, alternate email >>>> grubert at users.sourceforge.net >>>> >>>> all the best >>>> engelbert >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://darefoot.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PSF-Board mailing list >>>> PSF-Board at python.org >>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pat Campbell >>> PSF Administrator/Secretary >>> patcam at python.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Pat Campbell >> PSF Administrator/Secretary >> patcam at python.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> >> > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers -- Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Wed Jun 29 20:39:53 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:39:53 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for the information Nick.WeI have located Engelbert's tracker profile. Pat On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Pat Campbell wrote: > > Hi Engelbert: > > > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > > pull up your profile information with the following information: > > > > user name: gruber > > I believe the original email indicated the username was 'grubert' (the > above is missing the final 't') > > Regards, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Wed Jun 29 20:51:10 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:51:10 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Charles-Francois: I do have a hardcopy of your contributor agreement (rec'd on 5/20/2011). However, I would like to add your contributor agreement to the bug tracker. Could you please forward your tracker id and username? Thanks, Pat 2011/6/29 Charles-Fran?ois Natali > Hi, > > Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker > profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to > "No"). > Should I send it again? > > cf > > > 2011/6/28 Pat Campbell : > > Hi Engelbert: > > > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > > pull up your profile information with the following information: > > > > user name: gruber > > Real name: Engelbert Gruber > > > > I am unable to gain access to your tracker profile. So, maybe you can > > try accessing your profile and/or send me more information so that I > > can add your contributor agreement to the tracker. > > > > Thanks, > > Pat > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > >> > >> Hi Grubert: > >> > >> Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. > >> > >> Pat Campbell > >> PSF Secretary > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:02 AM, engelbert gruber > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> hello, > >>> > >>> on bugs and pypi it is user grubert, alternate email > >>> grubert at users.sourceforge.net > >>> > >>> all the best > >>> engelbert > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://darefoot.blogspot.com > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> PSF-Board mailing list > >>> PSF-Board at python.org > >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Pat Campbell > >> PSF Administrator/Secretary > >> patcam at python.org > > > > > > > > -- > > Pat Campbell > > PSF Administrator/Secretary > > patcam at python.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > > > > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Thu Jun 30 00:17:40 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:17:40 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for the clarification, Engelbert. Pat On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:54 PM, engelbert gruber < engelbert.gruber at gmail.com> wrote: > sorry for the puzzle. at times i thought grubert is cool it is > gru(engel)bert and there is ratbert and dilbert and donot forget major > grubert. > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > > Thanks for the information Nick.WeI have located Engelbert's tracker > > profile. > > > > Pat > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Nick Coghlan > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Pat Campbell > wrote: > >> > Hi Engelbert: > >> > > >> > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > >> > pull up your profile information with the following information: > >> > > >> > user name: gruber > >> > >> I believe the original email indicated the username was 'grubert' (the > >> above is missing the final 't') > >> > >> Regards, > >> Nick. > >> > >> -- > >> Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > > > > > > > > -- > > Pat Campbell > > PSF Administrator/Secretary > > patcam at python.org > > > > > > -- > http://darefoot.blogspot.com > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve at holdenweb.com Thu Jun 30 00:23:30 2011 From: steve at holdenweb.com (Steve Holden) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:23:30 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3BA22E3A-3D76-49EB-B047-D936D9C9BAEA@holdenweb.com> I think grubert is a cool user name! You'll have to be the dev team's evil HR director ... regards Steve On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:54 PM, engelbert gruber wrote: > sorry for the puzzle. at times i thought grubert is cool it is > gru(engel)bert and there is ratbert and dilbert and donot forget major > grubert. > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: >> Thanks for the information Nick.WeI have located Engelbert's tracker >> profile. >> >> Pat >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Pat Campbell wrote: >>>> Hi Engelbert: >>>> >>>> Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to >>>> pull up your profile information with the following information: >>>> >>>> user name: gruber >>> >>> I believe the original email indicated the username was 'grubert' (the >>> above is missing the final 't') >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nick. >>> >>> -- >>> Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia >> >> >> >> -- >> Pat Campbell >> PSF Administrator/Secretary >> patcam at python.org >> > > > > -- > http://darefoot.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Board mailing list > PSF-Board at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board -- Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve at holdenweb.com Thu Jun 30 00:24:55 2011 From: steve at holdenweb.com (Steve Holden) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:24:55 -0700 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <58EFC44C-D197-463C-B90E-EAE48997E210@holdenweb.com> You meant "grubert", of course. It amuses my non-computer friends that people often greet me as "holdenweb" at PyCon and similar places. regards Steve On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Thanks for the clarification, Engelbert. -- Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Thu Jun 30 03:32:43 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:32:43 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: <58EFC44C-D197-463C-B90E-EAE48997E210@holdenweb.com> References: <58EFC44C-D197-463C-B90E-EAE48997E210@holdenweb.com> Message-ID: Okay Steve, don't confuse me :0. Pat On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > You meant "grubert", of course. > > It amuses my non-computer friends that people often greet me as "holdenweb" > at PyCon and similar places. > > regards > Steve > > On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification, Engelbert. > > > -- > Steve Holden > steve at holdenweb.com > > > > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ncoghlan at gmail.com Thu Jun 30 12:53:39 2011 From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:53:39 +1000 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/6/30 Pat Campbell : > Hi Charles-Francois: > > I do have a hardcopy of your contributor agreement (rec'd > on 5/20/2011). However, I would like to add your contributor > agreement to the bug tracker. > > Could you please forward your tracker id and username? http://bugs.python.org/user12146 It's probably best if we try to remember to collect tracker user names when we collect contributor forms in the future (I know I've generally neglected to ask in the past). Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan?? |?? ncoghlan at gmail.com?? |?? Brisbane, Australia From patcam at python.org Thu Jun 30 20:11:48 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:11:48 -0400 Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Excellent idea. Thanks Nick. Pat 2011/6/30 Nick Coghlan > 2011/6/30 Pat Campbell : > > Hi Charles-Francois: > > > > I do have a hardcopy of your contributor agreement (rec'd > > on 5/20/2011). However, I would like to add your contributor > > agreement to the bug tracker. > > > > Could you please forward your tracker id and username? > > http://bugs.python.org/user12146 > > It's probably best if we try to remember to collect tracker user names > when we collect contributor forms in the future (I know I've generally > neglected to ask in the past). > > Regards, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: