[Python-checkins] bpo-46528: Simplify BUILD_TUPLE/UNPACK_SEQUENCE folding (GH-31039)

brandtbucher webhook-mailer at python.org
Tue Feb 1 16:41:43 EST 2022


https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a0e55a571cf01885fd5826266c37abaee307c309
commit: a0e55a571cf01885fd5826266c37abaee307c309
branch: main
author: Brandt Bucher <brandt at python.org>
committer: brandtbucher <brandtbucher at gmail.com>
date: 2022-02-01T13:41:32-08:00
summary:

bpo-46528: Simplify BUILD_TUPLE/UNPACK_SEQUENCE folding (GH-31039)

files:
M Lib/test/test_peepholer.py
M Python/compile.c

diff --git a/Lib/test/test_peepholer.py b/Lib/test/test_peepholer.py
index 659f654b5c676..2df5883ce7918 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_peepholer.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_peepholer.py
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ def test_pack_unpack(self):
                 code = compile(line,'','single')
                 self.assertInBytecode(code, elem)
                 self.assertNotInBytecode(code, 'BUILD_TUPLE')
-                self.assertNotInBytecode(code, 'UNPACK_TUPLE')
+                self.assertNotInBytecode(code, 'UNPACK_SEQUENCE')
                 self.check_lnotab(code)
 
     def test_folding_of_tuples_of_constants(self):
diff --git a/Python/compile.c b/Python/compile.c
index eda708e21f16a..1d2d567e85e93 100644
--- a/Python/compile.c
+++ b/Python/compile.c
@@ -8661,29 +8661,22 @@ optimize_basic_block(struct compiler *c, basicblock *bb, PyObject *consts)
             }
 
                 /* Try to fold tuples of constants.
-                   Skip over BUILD_SEQN 1 UNPACK_SEQN 1.
-                   Replace BUILD_SEQN 2 UNPACK_SEQN 2 with ROT2.
-                   Replace BUILD_SEQN 3 UNPACK_SEQN 3 with ROT3 ROT2. */
+                   Skip over BUILD_TUPLE(1) UNPACK_SEQUENCE(1).
+                   Replace BUILD_TUPLE(2) UNPACK_SEQUENCE(2) with SWAP(2).
+                   Replace BUILD_TUPLE(3) UNPACK_SEQUENCE(3) with SWAP(3). */
             case BUILD_TUPLE:
                 if (nextop == UNPACK_SEQUENCE && oparg == bb->b_instr[i+1].i_oparg) {
                     switch(oparg) {
                         case 1:
                             inst->i_opcode = NOP;
                             bb->b_instr[i+1].i_opcode = NOP;
-                            break;
+                            continue;
                         case 2:
-                            inst->i_opcode = SWAP;
-                            inst->i_oparg = 2;
-                            bb->b_instr[i+1].i_opcode = NOP;
-                            i--;
-                            break;
                         case 3:
-                            inst->i_opcode = SWAP;
-                            inst->i_oparg = 3;
-                            bb->b_instr[i+1].i_opcode = NOP;
-                            i--;
+                            inst->i_opcode = NOP;
+                            bb->b_instr[i+1].i_opcode = SWAP;
+                            continue;
                     }
-                    break;
                 }
                 if (i >= oparg) {
                     if (fold_tuple_on_constants(c, inst-oparg, oparg, consts)) {



More information about the Python-checkins mailing list