[Python-checkins] bpo-44353: Document that typing.NewType is now a class (GH-27319) (GH-27321)

[ambv]

https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d15949a845a6db66675bca7105ad508ba9e79639
commit: d15949a845a6db66675bca7105ad508ba9e79639
branch: 3.10
author: Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-islington at users.noreply.github.com>
committer: ambv <lukasz at langa.pl>
date: 2021-07-24T11:31:33+02:00
summary:

bpo-44353: Document that typing.NewType is now a class (GH-27319) (GH-27321)

(cherry picked from commit 7aac3f623610cf3dffbf548a5be5bfd4fa6790a0)

Co-authored-by: Ken Jin <28750310+Fidget-Spinner at users.noreply.github.com>

files:
M Doc/library/typing.rst

diff --git a/Doc/library/typing.rst b/Doc/library/typing.rst
index b1d67e46fbb5d..8cccdc0d62246 100644
--- a/Doc/library/typing.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/typing.rst
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Note that ``None`` as a type hint is a special case and is replaced by
 NewType
 =======
 
-Use the :func:`NewType` helper function to create distinct types::
+Use the :class:`NewType` helper class to create distinct types::
 
    from typing import NewType
 
@@ -106,15 +106,14 @@ accidentally creating a ``UserId`` in an invalid way::
 
 Note that these checks are enforced only by the static type checker. At runtime,
 the statement ``Derived = NewType('Derived', Base)`` will make ``Derived`` a
-function that immediately returns whatever parameter you pass it. That means
+class that immediately returns whatever parameter you pass it. That means
 the expression ``Derived(some_value)`` does not create a new class or introduce
-any overhead beyond that of a regular function call.
+much overhead beyond that of a regular function call.
 
 More precisely, the expression ``some_value is Derived(some_value)`` is always
 true at runtime.
 
-This also means that it is not possible to create a subtype of ``Derived``
-since it is an identity function at runtime, not an actual type::
+It is invalid to create a subtype of ``Derived``::
 
    from typing import NewType
 
@@ -123,7 +122,7 @@ since it is an identity function at runtime, not an actual type::
    # Fails at runtime and does not typecheck
    class AdminUserId(UserId): pass
 
-However, it is possible to create a :func:`NewType` based on a 'derived' ``NewType``::
+However, it is possible to create a :class:`NewType` based on a 'derived' ``NewType``::
 
    from typing import NewType
 
@@ -151,6 +150,12 @@ See :pep:`484` for more details.
 
 .. versionadded:: 3.5.2
 
+.. versionchanged:: 3.10.0
+   ``NewType`` is now a class rather than a function.  There is some additional
+   runtime cost when calling ``NewType`` over a regular function.  However, this
+   cost will be reduced in 3.11.0.
+
+
 Callable
 ========
 
@@ -1306,17 +1311,21 @@ These are not used in annotations. They are building blocks for declaring types.
       Removed the ``_field_types`` attribute in favor of the more
       standard ``__annotations__`` attribute which has the same information.
 
-.. function:: NewType(name, tp)
+.. class:: NewType(name, tp)
 
-   A helper function to indicate a distinct type to a typechecker,
-   see :ref:`distinct`. At runtime it returns a function that returns
-   its argument. Usage::
+   A helper class to indicate a distinct type to a typechecker,
+   see :ref:`distinct`. At runtime it returns an object that returns
+   its argument when called.
+   Usage::
 
       UserId = NewType('UserId', int)
       first_user = UserId(1)
 
    .. versionadded:: 3.5.2
 
+   .. versionchanged:: 3.10.0
+      ``NewType`` is now a class rather than a function.
+
 .. class:: TypedDict(dict)
 
    Special construct to add type hints to a dictionary.