[Python-checkins] peps: Add link to survey by Steven D, and summarize the two responses so far.

[guido.van.rossum]

https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/7f846f74013f
changeset:   5600:7f846f74013f
user:        Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
date:        Mon Nov 17 16:12:26 2014 -0800
summary:
  Add link to survey by Steven D, and summarize the two responses so far.

files:
  pep-0479.txt |  8 ++++++++
  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0479.txt b/pep-0479.txt
--- a/pep-0479.txt
+++ b/pep-0479.txt
@@ -174,6 +174,11 @@
 behaviour (e.g. [2]_, [5]_, [6]_), and there is the concern that this
 would be unnecessary code churn to achieve little or no gain.
 
+Steven D'Aprano started an informal survey on comp.lang.python [9]_;
+at the time of writing only two responses have been received: one was
+in favor of changing list comprehensions to match generator
+expressions (!), the other was in favor of this PEP's main proposal.
+
 
 References
 ==========
@@ -202,6 +207,9 @@
 .. [8] Coroutines in asyncio
    (https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#coroutines)
 
+.. [9] Thread on comp.lang.python started by Steven D'Aprano
+   (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2014-November/680757.html)
+
 Copyright
 =========
 

-- 
Repository URL: https://hg.python.org/peps