[Python-checkins] cpython: Fixes Issue #20165: The unittest module no longer considers tests marked with

gregory.p.smith python-checkins at python.org
Mon Jan 20 10:11:30 CET 2014


http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1e75ab9fd760
changeset:   88579:1e75ab9fd760
user:        Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org>
date:        Mon Jan 20 01:11:18 2014 -0800
summary:
  Fixes Issue #20165: The unittest module no longer considers tests marked with
@expectedFailure successful if they pass.

files:
  Doc/library/unittest.rst           |   4 ++++
  Lib/unittest/result.py             |  11 ++++++++---
  Lib/unittest/test/test_skipping.py |   4 ++--
  Misc/NEWS                          |   3 +++
  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


diff --git a/Doc/library/unittest.rst b/Doc/library/unittest.rst
--- a/Doc/library/unittest.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/unittest.rst
@@ -1772,6 +1772,10 @@
       Return ``True`` if all tests run so far have passed, otherwise returns
       ``False``.
 
+      .. versionchanged:: 3.4
+         Returns ``False`` if there were any :attr:`unexpectedSuccesses`
+         from tests marked with the :func:`expectedFailure` decorator.
+
 
    .. method:: stop()
 
diff --git a/Lib/unittest/result.py b/Lib/unittest/result.py
--- a/Lib/unittest/result.py
+++ b/Lib/unittest/result.py
@@ -156,11 +156,16 @@
         self.unexpectedSuccesses.append(test)
 
     def wasSuccessful(self):
-        "Tells whether or not this result was a success"
-        return len(self.failures) == len(self.errors) == 0
+        """Tells whether or not this result was a success."""
+        # The hasattr check is for test_result's OldResult test.  That
+        # way this method works on objects that lack the attribute.
+        # (where would such result intances come from? old stored pickles?)
+        return ((len(self.failures) == len(self.errors) == 0) and
+                (not hasattr(self, 'unexpectedSuccesses') or
+                 len(self.unexpectedSuccesses) == 0))
 
     def stop(self):
-        "Indicates that the tests should be aborted"
+        """Indicates that the tests should be aborted."""
         self.shouldStop = True
 
     def _exc_info_to_string(self, err, test):
diff --git a/Lib/unittest/test/test_skipping.py b/Lib/unittest/test/test_skipping.py
--- a/Lib/unittest/test/test_skipping.py
+++ b/Lib/unittest/test/test_skipping.py
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
                          ['startTest', 'addUnexpectedSuccess', 'stopTest'])
         self.assertFalse(result.failures)
         self.assertEqual(result.unexpectedSuccesses, [test])
-        self.assertTrue(result.wasSuccessful())
+        self.assertFalse(result.wasSuccessful())
 
     def test_unexpected_success_subtests(self):
         # Success in all subtests counts as the unexpected success of
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
                           'addUnexpectedSuccess', 'stopTest'])
         self.assertFalse(result.failures)
         self.assertEqual(result.unexpectedSuccesses, [test])
-        self.assertTrue(result.wasSuccessful())
+        self.assertFalse(result.wasSuccessful())
 
     def test_skip_doesnt_run_setup(self):
         class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS
--- a/Misc/NEWS
+++ b/Misc/NEWS
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@
 Library
 -------
 
+- Issue #20165: The unittest module no longer considers tests marked with
+  @expectedFailure successful if they pass.
+
 - Issue #18574: Added missing newline in 100-Continue reply from
   http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler. Patch by Nikolaus Rath.
 

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/cpython


More information about the Python-checkins mailing list