[Python-checkins] peps: Add PEP 445: The Argument Clinic DSL

brett.cannon python-checkins at python.org
Mon Feb 25 17:40:03 CET 2013


http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/7aa92fb33436
changeset:   4776:7aa92fb33436
user:        Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>
date:        Mon Feb 25 11:39:56 2013 -0500
summary:
  Add PEP 445: The Argument Clinic DSL

files:
  pep-0445.txt |  481 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 481 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0445.txt b/pep-0445.txt
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pep-0445.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,481 @@
+PEP: 445
+Title: The Argument Clinic DSL
+Version: $Revision$
+Last-Modified: $Date$
+Author: Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org>
+Discussions-To: Python-Dev <python-dev at python.org>
+Status: Draft
+Type: Standards Track
+Content-Type: text/x-rst
+Created: 22-Feb-2013
+
+
+Abstract
+========
+
+This document proposes "Argument Clinic", a DSL designed
+to facilitate argument processing for built-in functions
+in the implementation of CPython.  
+
+Rationale and Goals
+===================
+
+The primary implementation of Python, "CPython", is written in
+a mixture of Python and C.  One of the implementation details
+of CPython is what are called "built-in" functions--functions
+available to Python programs but written in C.  When a
+Python program calls a built-in function and passes in
+arguments, those arguments must be translated from Python
+values into C values.  This process is called "parsing arguments".
+
+As of CPython 3.3, arguments to functions are primarily
+parsed with one of two functions: the original
+``PyArg_ParseTuple()``, [1]_  and the more modern
+``PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()``. [2]_
+The former function only handles positional parameters; the
+latter also accomodates keyword and keyword-only parameters,
+and is preferred for new code.
+
+``PyArg_ParseTuple()`` was a reasonable approach when it was
+first concieved.  The programmer specified the translation for
+the arguments in a "format string": [3]_ each parameter matched to
+a "format unit", a one-or-two character sequence telling
+``PyArg_ParseTuple()`` what Python types to accept and how
+to translate them into the appropriate C value for that
+parameter.  There were only a dozen or so of these "format
+units", and each one was distinct and easy to understand.
+
+Over the years the ``PyArg_Parse`` interface has been extended in
+numerous ways.  The modern API is quite complex, to the point
+that it is somewhat painful to use.  Consider:
+
+  * There are now forty different "format units"; a few are
+    even three characters long.
+    This overload of symbology makes it difficult to understand
+    what the format string says without constantly cross-indexing
+    it with the documentation.
+  * There are also six meta-format units that may be buried
+    in the format string.  (They are: ``"()|$:;"``.)
+  * The more format units are added, the less likely it is the
+    implementor can pick an easy-to-use mnemonic for the format
+    unit, because the character of choice is probably already in
+    use.  In other words, the more format units we have, the more
+    obtuse the format units become.
+  * Several format units are nearly identical to others, having
+    only subtle differences.  This makes understanding the exact
+    semantics of the format string even harder.
+  * The docstring is specified as a static C string,
+    which is mildly bothersome to read and edit.
+  * When adding a new parameter to a function using
+    ``PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()``, it's necessary to
+    touch six different places in the code: [4]_
+
+      * Declaring the variable to store the argument.
+      * Passing in a pointer to that variable in the correct
+        spot in ``PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()``, also passing
+        in any "length" or "converter" arguments in the correct
+        order.
+      * Adding the name of the argument in the correct spot
+        of the "keywords" array passed in to
+        ``PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()``.
+      * Adding the format unit to the correct spot in the
+        format string.
+      * Adding the parameter to the prototype in the
+        docstring.
+      * Documenting the parameter in the docstring.
+
+  * There is currently no mechanism for builtin functions
+    to provide their "signature" information (see
+    ``inspect.getfullargspec`` and ``inspect.Signature``).
+    Adding this information using a mechanism similar to
+    the existing ``PyArg_Parse`` functions would require
+    repeating ourselves yet again.
+
+The goal of Argument Clinic is to replace this API with a
+mechanism inheriting none of these downsides:
+
+  * You need specify each parameter only once.
+  * All information about a parameter is kept together in one place.
+  * For each parameter, you specify its type in C;
+    Argument Clinic handles the translation from
+    Python value into C value for you.
+  * Argument Clinic also allows for fine-tuning
+    of argument processing behavior with
+    highly-readable "flags", both per-parameter
+    and applying across the whole function.
+  * Docstrings are written in plain text.
+  * From this, Argument Clinic generates for you all
+    the mundane, repetitious code and data structures
+    CPython needs internally.  Once you've specified
+    the interface, the next step is simply to write your
+    implementation using native C types.  Every detail
+    of argument parsing is handled for you.
+
+Future goals of Argument Clinic include:
+
+  * providing signature information for builtins, and
+  * speed improvements to the generated code.  
+
+DSL Syntax Summary
+==================
+
+The Argument Clinic DSL is specified as a comment
+embedded in a C file, as follows.  The "Example" column on the
+right shows you sample input to the Argument Clinic DSL,
+and the "Section" column on the left specifies what each line
+represents in turn.
+
+::
+
+ +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
+ | Section               | Example                                             |
+ +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
+ | Clinic DSL start      | /*[clinic]                                          |
+ | Function declaration  | module.function_name -> return_annotation           |
+ | Function flags        | flag flag2 flag3=value                              |
+ | Parameter declaration |       type name = default                           |
+ | Parameter flags       |       flag flag2 flag3=value                        |
+ | Parameter docstring   |           Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur   |
+ |                       |           adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor   |
+ | Function docstring    | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing |
+ |                       | elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et |
+ | Clinic DSL end        | [clinic]*/                                          |
+ | Clinic output         | ...                                                 |
+ | Clinic output end     | /*[clinic end output:<checksum>]*/                  |
+ +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
+
+
+General Behavior Of the Argument Clinic DSL
+-------------------------------------------
+
+All lines support ``#`` as a line comment delimiter *except* docstrings.
+Blank lines are always ignored.
+
+Like Python itself, leading whitespace is significant in the Argument Clinic
+DSL.  The first line  of the "function" section is the declaration;
+all subsequent lines at the same indent are function flags.  Once you indent,
+the first line is a parameter declaration; subsequent lines at that indent
+are parameter flags.  Indent one more time for the lines of the parameter
+docstring.  Finally, outdent back to the same level as the function
+declaration for the function docstring.
+
+Function Declaration
+--------------------
+
+The return annotation is optional.  If skipped, the arrow ("``->``") must also be omitted.
+
+Parameter Declaration
+---------------------
+
+The "type" is a C type.  If it's a pointer type, you must specify
+a single space between the type and the "``*``", and zero spaces between
+the "``*``" and the name.  (e.g. "``PyObject *foo``", not "``PyObject* foo``")
+
+The "name" must be a legal C identifier.
+
+The "default" is a Python value.  Default values are optional;
+if not specified you must omit the equals sign too.  Parameters
+which don't have a default are implicitly required.  The default
+value is dynamically assigned, "live" in the generated C code,
+and although it's specified as a Python value, it's translated
+into a native C value in the generated C code.
+
+It's explicitly permitted to end the parameter declaration line
+with a semicolon, though the semicolon is optional.  This is
+intended to allow directly cutting and pasting in declarations
+from C code.  However, the preferred style is without the semicolon.
+
+
+Flags
+-----
+
+"Flags" are like "``make -D``" arguments.  They're unordered.  Flags lines
+are parsed much like the shell (specifically, using ``shlex.split()`` [5]_ ).
+You can have as many flag lines as you like.  Specifying a flag twice
+is currently an error.
+
+Supported flags for functions:
+
+``basename``
+  The basename to use for the generated C functions.
+  By default this is the name of the function from
+  the DSL, only with periods replaced by underscores.
+
+``positional-only``
+  This function only supports positional parameters,
+  not keyword parameters.  See `Functions With
+  Positional-Only Parameters`_ below.
+
+Supported flags for parameters:
+
+``bitwise``
+  If the Python integer passed in is signed, copy the
+  bits directly even if it is negative.  Only valid
+  for unsigned integer types.
+
+``converter``
+  Backwards-compatibility support for parameter "converter"
+  functions. [6]_  The value should be the name of the converter
+  function in C.  Only valid when the type of the parameter
+  is ``void *``.
+
+``default``
+  The Python value to use in place of the parameter's actual
+  default in Python contexts.  Specifically, when specified,
+  this value will be used for the parameter's default in the
+  docstring, and in the ``Signature``.  (TBD: If the string is a
+  valid Python expression, renderable into a Python value
+  using ``eval()``, then the result of ``eval()`` on it will be used
+  as the default in the ``Signature``.)  Ignored if there is no
+  default.
+
+``encoding``
+  Encoding to use when encoding a Unicode string to a ``char *``.
+  Only valid when the type of the parameter is ``char *``.
+
+``group=``
+  This parameter is part of a group of options that must either
+  all be specified or none specified.  Parameters in the same
+  "group" must be contiguous.  The value of the group flag
+  is the name used for the group variable, and therefore must
+  be legal as a C identifier.  Only valid for functions
+  marked "``positional-only``"; see `Functions With
+  Positional-Only Parameters`_ below.
+
+``immutable``
+  Only accept immutable values.
+
+``keyword-only``
+  This parameter (and all subsequent parameters) is
+  keyword-only.  Keyword-only parameters must also be
+  optional parameters.  Not valid for positional-only functions.
+
+``length``
+  This is an iterable type, and we also want its length.  The
+  DSL will generate a second ``Py_ssize_t`` variable;
+  its name will be this parameter's name appended with
+  "``_length``".
+
+``nullable``
+  ``None`` is a legal argument for this parameter.  If ``None`` is
+  supplied on the Python side, the equivalent C argument will be
+  ``NULL``.  Only valid for pointer types.
+
+``required``
+  Normally any parameter that has a default value is
+  automatically optional.  A parameter that has "required"
+  set will be considered required (non-optional) even if
+  it has a default value.  The generated documentation
+  will also not show any default value.
+
+``types``
+  Space-separated list of acceptable Python types for this
+  object.  There are also four special-case types which
+  represent Python protocols:
+
+    * buffer
+    * mapping
+    * number
+    * sequence
+
+``zeroes``
+  This parameter is a string type, and its value should be
+  allowed to have embedded zeroes.  Not valid for all
+  varieties of string parameters.
+
+
+Python Code
+-----------
+
+Argument Clinic also permits embedding Python code inside C files,
+which is executed in-place when Argument Clinic processes the file.
+Embedded code looks like this:
+
+::
+
+    /*[python]
+
+    # this is python code!
+    print("/" + "* Hello world! *" + "/")
+
+    [python]*/
+
+Any Python code is valid.  Python code sections in Argument Clinic
+can also be used to modify Clinic's behavior at runtime; for example,
+see `Extending Argument Clinic`_.
+
+
+Output
+======
+
+Argument Clinic writes its output in-line in the C file, immediately after
+the section of Clinic code.  For "python" sections, the output is
+everything printed using ``builtins.print``.  For "clinic" sections, the
+output is valid C code, including:
+
+  * a ``#define`` providing the correct ``methoddef`` structure for the
+    function
+  * a prototype for the "impl" function--this is what you'll write to
+    implement this function
+  * a function that handles all argument processing, which calls your
+    "impl" function
+  * the definition line of the "impl" function
+  * and a comment indicating the end of output.
+
+The intention is that you will write the body of your impl function
+immediately after the output--as in, you write a left-curly-brace
+immediately after the end-of-output comment and write the implementation
+of the builtin in the body there.  (It's a bit strange at first--but oddly
+convenient.)
+
+Argument Clinic will define the parameters of the impl function for you.
+The function will take the "self" parameter passed in originally, all
+the parameters you define, and possibly some extra generated parameters
+("length" parameters; also "group" parameters, see next section).
+
+Argument Clinic also writes a checksum for the output section.  This
+is a valuable safety feature: if you modify the output by hand, Clinic
+will notice that the checksum doesn't match, and will refuse to
+overwrite the file.  (You can force Clinic to overwrite with the "``-f``"
+command-line argument; Clinic will also ignore the checksums when
+using the "``-o``" command-line argument.)
+
+
+Functions With Positional-Only Parameters
+=========================================
+
+A significant fraction of Python builtins implemented in C use the
+older positional-only API for processing arguments (``PyArg_ParseTuple()``).
+In some instances, these builtins parse their arguments differently
+based on how many arguments were passed in.  This can provide some
+bewildering flexibility: there may be groups of optional parameters,
+which must either all be specified or none specified.  And occasionally
+these groups are on the *left!*  (For example: ``curses.window.addch()``.)
+
+Argument Clinic supports these legacy use-cases with a special set
+of flags.  First, set the flag "``positional-only``" on the entire
+function.  Then, for every group of parameters that is collectively
+optional, add a "``group=``" flag with a unique string to all the
+parameters in that group.  Note that these groups are permitted on
+the right *or left* of any required parameters!  However, all groups
+(including the group of required parameters) must be contiguous.
+
+The impl function generated by Clinic will add an extra parameter for
+every group, "``int <group>_group``".  This argument will be nonzero if
+the group was specified on this call, and zero if it was not.
+
+Note that when operating in this mode, you cannot specify default
+arguments.  You can simulate defaults by putting parameters in
+individual groups and detecting whether or not they were
+specified--but generally speaking it's better to simply not
+use "positional-only" where it isn't absolutely necessary.  (TBD: It
+might be possible to relax this restriction.  But adding default
+arguments into the mix of groups would seemingly make calculating which
+groups are active a good deal harder.)
+
+Also, note that it's possible--even easy--to specify a set of groups 
+to a function such that there are several valid mappings from the number
+of arguments to a valid set of groups.  If this happens, Clinic will exit
+with an error message.  This should not be a problem, as positional-only
+operation is only intended for legacy use cases, and all the legacy
+functions using this quirky behavior should have unambiguous mappings.
+
+
+Current Status
+==============
+
+As of this writing, there is a working prototype implementation of
+Argument Clinic available online. [7]_  The prototype implements
+the syntax above, and generates code using the existing ``PyArg_Parse``
+APIs.  It supports translating to all current format units except ``"w*"``.
+Sample functions using Argument Clinic exercise all major features,
+including positional-only argument parsing.
+
+Extending Argument Clinic
+-------------------------
+
+The prototype also currently provides an experimental extension mechanism,
+allowing adding support for new types on-the-fly.  See ``Modules/posixmodule.c``
+in the prototype for an example of its use.
+
+
+Notes / TBD
+===========
+
+* Guido proposed having the "function docstring" be hand-written inline,
+  in the middle of the output, something like this:
+
+  ::
+  
+   /*[clinic]
+     ... prototype and parameters (including parameter docstrings) go here
+   [clinic]*/
+   ... some output ...
+   /*[clinic docstring start]*/
+   ... hand-edited function docstring goes here   <-- you edit this by hand!
+   /*[clinic docstring end]*/
+   ... more output
+   /*[clinic output end]*/
+
+  I tried it this way and don't like it--I think it's clumsy.  I prefer that
+  everything you write goes in one place, rather than having an island of
+  hand-edited stuff in the middle of the DSL output.
+
+* Do we need to support tuple unpacking?  (The "``(OOO)``" style format string.)
+  Boy I sure hope not.
+
+* What about Python functions that take no arguments?  This syntax doesn't
+  provide for that.  Perhaps a lone indented "None" should mean "no arguments"?
+
+* This approach removes some dynamism / flexibility.  With the existing
+  syntax one could theoretically pass in different encodings at runtime for
+  the "``es``"/"``et``" format units.  AFAICT CPython doesn't do this itself,
+  however it's possible external users might do this.  (Trivia: there are no
+  uses of "``es``" exercised by regrtest, and all the uses of "``et``"
+  exercised are in socketmodule.c, except for one in _ssl.c.  They're all
+  static, specifying the encoding ``"idna"``.)
+
+* Right now the "basename" flag on a function changes the ``#define methoddef`` name
+  too.  Should it, or should the #define'd methoddef name always be 
+  ``{module_name}_{function_name}`` ?
+
+
+References
+==========
+
+.. [1] ``PyArg_ParseTuple()``:
+   http://docs.python.org/3/c-api/arg.html#PyArg_ParseTuple
+
+.. [2] ``PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()``:
+   http://docs.python.org/3/c-api/arg.html#PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords
+
+.. [3] ``PyArg_`` format units:
+   http://docs.python.org/3/c-api/arg.html#strings-and-buffers
+
+.. [4] Keyword parameters for extension functions:
+   http://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#keyword-parameters-for-extension-functions
+
+.. [5] ``shlex.split()``:
+   http://docs.python.org/3/library/shlex.html#shlex.split
+
+.. [6] ``PyArg_`` "converter" functions, see ``"O&"`` in this section:
+   http://docs.python.org/3/c-api/arg.html#other-objects
+
+.. [7] Argument Clinic prototype:
+   https://bitbucket.org/larry/python-clinic/
+
+Copyright
+=========
+
+This document has been placed in the public domain.
+
+
+
+..
+   Local Variables:
+   mode: indented-text
+   indent-tabs-mode: nil
+   sentence-end-double-space: t
+   fill-column: 70
+   coding: utf-8
+   End:

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps


More information about the Python-checkins mailing list