[Python-checkins] peps: some notes about test cases
georg.brandl
python-checkins at python.org
Wed Mar 23 21:24:24 CET 2011
http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/07439b427b11
changeset: 78:07439b427b11
user: Jeremy Hylton <jeremy at alum.mit.edu>
date: Mon Aug 07 17:04:27 2000 +0000
summary:
some notes about test cases
couple of more small action items
files:
pep-0200.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pep-0200.txt b/pep-0200.txt
--- a/pep-0200.txt
+++ b/pep-0200.txt
@@ -83,10 +83,16 @@
anyway, but that's another matter.) If the test cases are known
to fail, they serve no useful purpose.
- The current test suite runs correctly on my Linux box (July 26).
- Heard reports that test_fork1 fails on some Linux boxes and that
- test_winreg and test_winreg32 fail on Windows.
-
+ test case platform R B date reported note
+ test_mmap Win32 X X July 26, 2000
+ [believe that was fixed by Mark H.]
+ test_winreg Win32 X X July 26, 2000
+ test_winreg2 Win32 X X July 26, 2000
+ test_popen2 Win32 X X July 26, 2000 skipped
+ [believe this was fix by /F]
+ test_fork1 Linux X July 26, 2000 just SMP?
+ [no clue; there are probably two bugs here]
+
Open items -- should be done/fixed
Decoding errors when comparing strings. There is a dictionary bug
@@ -129,6 +135,12 @@
Open: proposed but not accepted or declined
+ * Fix xrange printing behavior
+
+ * Tim O'Malley's cookie module -- but need different license
+
+ * test harness for C code - Trent Mick
+
* List comprehensions - Tim Peters?
Need a coherent proposal. Lots of confusing discussion going
on.
--
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list