[Python-checkins] peps: Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives

georg.brandl python-checkins at python.org
Wed Mar 23 21:23:26 CET 2011


http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/1d290942c24d
changeset:   48:1d290942c24d
user:        Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
date:        Tue Jul 25 22:00:05 2000 +0000
summary:
  Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives
in Open Issues.

files:
  pep-0201.txt |  11 +++++++----
  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0201.txt b/pep-0201.txt
--- a/pep-0201.txt
+++ b/pep-0201.txt
@@ -375,10 +375,13 @@
       with the zip compression algorithm.  Other suggestions include
       (but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
       interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
-      plait, fold, and with.  All have disadvantages, and there is no
-      clear unanimous choice, therefore the decision was made to go
-      with `zip' because the same functionality is available in other
-      languages (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
+      plait, fold, with, mktuples, maketuples, totuples, gentuples,
+      tupleorama.
+
+      All have disadvantages, and there is no clear unanimous choice,
+      therefore the decision was made to go with `zip' because the
+      same functionality is available in other languages
+      (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
 
     - Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be
       in a separate generators module (possibly with other candidate

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps


More information about the Python-checkins mailing list