[Python-checkins] peps: Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives
georg.brandl
python-checkins at python.org
Wed Mar 23 21:23:26 CET 2011
http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/1d290942c24d
changeset: 48:1d290942c24d
user: Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
date: Tue Jul 25 22:00:05 2000 +0000
summary:
Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives
in Open Issues.
files:
pep-0201.txt | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pep-0201.txt b/pep-0201.txt
--- a/pep-0201.txt
+++ b/pep-0201.txt
@@ -375,10 +375,13 @@
with the zip compression algorithm. Other suggestions include
(but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
- plait, fold, and with. All have disadvantages, and there is no
- clear unanimous choice, therefore the decision was made to go
- with `zip' because the same functionality is available in other
- languages (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
+ plait, fold, with, mktuples, maketuples, totuples, gentuples,
+ tupleorama.
+
+ All have disadvantages, and there is no clear unanimous choice,
+ therefore the decision was made to go with `zip' because the
+ same functionality is available in other languages
+ (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
- Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be
in a separate generators module (possibly with other candidate
--
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list