[Python-checkins] r81557 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/test/test_long.py Misc/NEWS Objects/longobject.c
mark.dickinson
python-checkins at python.org
Wed May 26 22:07:58 CEST 2010
Author: mark.dickinson
Date: Wed May 26 22:07:58 2010
New Revision: 81557
Log:
Issue #2844: Make int('42', n) consistently raise ValueError for
invalid integers n (including n = -909).
Modified:
python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_long.py
python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS
python/branches/py3k/Objects/longobject.c
Modified: python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_long.py
==============================================================================
--- python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_long.py (original)
+++ python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_long.py Wed May 26 22:07:58 2010
@@ -345,6 +345,16 @@
self.assertRaises(ValueError, int, '08', 0)
self.assertRaises(ValueError, int, '-012395', 0)
+ # invalid bases
+ invalid_bases = [-909,
+ 2**31-1, 2**31, -2**31, -2**31-1,
+ 2**63-1, 2**63, -2**63, -2**63-1,
+ 2**100, -2**100,
+ ]
+ for base in invalid_bases:
+ self.assertRaises(ValueError, int, '42', base)
+
+
def test_conversion(self):
class JustLong:
Modified: python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS
==============================================================================
--- python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS (original)
+++ python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS Wed May 26 22:07:58 2010
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
Core and Builtins
-----------------
+- Issue #2844: Make int('42', n) consistently raise ValueError for
+ invalid integers n (including n = -909).
+
- Issue #8188: Introduce a new scheme for computing hashes of numbers
(instances of int, float, complex, decimal.Decimal and
fractions.Fraction) that makes it easy to maintain the invariant
Modified: python/branches/py3k/Objects/longobject.c
==============================================================================
--- python/branches/py3k/Objects/longobject.c (original)
+++ python/branches/py3k/Objects/longobject.c Wed May 26 22:07:58 2010
@@ -4098,23 +4098,34 @@
static PyObject *
long_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
{
- PyObject *x = NULL;
- int base = -909; /* unlikely! */
+ PyObject *obase = NULL, *x = NULL;
+ long base;
+ int overflow;
static char *kwlist[] = {"x", "base", 0};
if (type != &PyLong_Type)
return long_subtype_new(type, args, kwds); /* Wimp out */
- if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "|Oi:int", kwlist,
- &x, &base))
+ if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "|OO:int", kwlist,
+ &x, &obase))
return NULL;
if (x == NULL)
return PyLong_FromLong(0L);
- if (base == -909)
+ if (obase == NULL)
return PyNumber_Long(x);
- else if (PyUnicode_Check(x))
+
+ base = PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow(obase, &overflow);
+ if (base == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
+ return NULL;
+ if (overflow || (base != 0 && base < 2) || base > 36) {
+ PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
+ "int() arg 2 must be >= 2 and <= 36");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (PyUnicode_Check(x))
return PyLong_FromUnicode(PyUnicode_AS_UNICODE(x),
PyUnicode_GET_SIZE(x),
- base);
+ (int)base);
else if (PyByteArray_Check(x) || PyBytes_Check(x)) {
/* Since PyLong_FromString doesn't have a length parameter,
* check here for possible NULs in the string. */
@@ -4129,10 +4140,10 @@
x is a bytes or buffer, *and* a base is given. */
PyErr_Format(PyExc_ValueError,
"invalid literal for int() with base %d: %R",
- base, x);
+ (int)base, x);
return NULL;
}
- return PyLong_FromString(string, NULL, base);
+ return PyLong_FromString(string, NULL, (int)base);
}
else {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError,
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list