[Python-checkins] r60793 - in python/branches/release25-maint: Include/pymem.h Include/pyport.h Lib/test/test_array.py Lib/test/test_struct.py Misc/NEWS Modules/_csv.c Modules/_struct.c Modules/arraymodule.c Modules/audioop.c Modules/binascii.c Modules/cPickle.c Modules/cStringIO.c Modules/cjkcodecs/multibytecodec.c Modules/datetimemodule.c Modules/md5.c Modules/rgbimgmodule.c Modules/stropmodule.c Objects/bufferobject.c Objects/listobject.c Objects/obmalloc.c Parser/node.c Python/asdl.c Python/ast.c Python/bltinmodule.c Python/compile.c
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 14:40:09 CET 2008
martin.v.loewis wrote:
> Modified: python/branches/release25-maint/Lib/test/test_array.py
> ==============================================================================
> --- python/branches/release25-maint/Lib/test/test_array.py (original)
> +++ python/branches/release25-maint/Lib/test/test_array.py Thu Feb 14 12:26:18 2008
> @@ -975,6 +975,23 @@
> class DoubleTest(FPTest):
> typecode = 'd'
> minitemsize = 8
> +
> + def test_alloc_overflow(self):
> + a = array.array('d', [-1]*65536)
> + try:
> + a *= 65536
> + except MemoryError:
> + pass
> + else:
> + self.fail("a *= 2**16 didn't raise MemoryError")
> + b = array.array('d', [ 2.71828183, 3.14159265, -1])
> + try:
> + b * 1431655766
> + except MemoryError:
> + pass
> + else:
> + self.fail("a * 1431655766 didn't raise MemoryError")
> +
Will those tests necessarily work properly on a 64-bit machine? The
sizes being tested seem very 32-bit-ish (and the relevant arraymodule
code seems to adjust dynamically to the larger 64-bit address space).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list