[Python-checkins] r53596 - python/trunk/Doc/howto/TODO python/trunk/Doc/howto/doanddont.tex python/trunk/Doc/howto/regex.tex
andrew.kuchling
python-checkins at python.org
Mon Jan 29 21:55:40 CET 2007
Author: andrew.kuchling
Date: Mon Jan 29 21:55:40 2007
New Revision: 53596
Modified:
python/trunk/Doc/howto/TODO
python/trunk/Doc/howto/doanddont.tex
python/trunk/Doc/howto/regex.tex
Log:
Various minor edits
Modified: python/trunk/Doc/howto/TODO
==============================================================================
--- python/trunk/Doc/howto/TODO (original)
+++ python/trunk/Doc/howto/TODO Mon Jan 29 21:55:40 2007
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Short-term tasks:
- Quick revision pass to make HOWTOs match the current state of Python:
-doanddont regex sockets sorting
+ Quick revision pass to make HOWTOs match the current state of Python
+doanddont regex sockets
Medium-term tasks:
Revisit the regex howto.
Modified: python/trunk/Doc/howto/doanddont.tex
==============================================================================
--- python/trunk/Doc/howto/doanddont.tex (original)
+++ python/trunk/Doc/howto/doanddont.tex Mon Jan 29 21:55:40 2007
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
\subsubsection{Inside Function Definitions}
\code{from module import *} is {\em invalid} inside function definitions.
-While many versions of Python do no check for the invalidity, it does not
+While many versions of Python do not check for the invalidity, it does not
make it more valid, no more then having a smart lawyer makes a man innocent.
Do not use it like that ever. Even in versions where it was accepted, it made
the function execution slower, because the compiler could not be certain
Modified: python/trunk/Doc/howto/regex.tex
==============================================================================
--- python/trunk/Doc/howto/regex.tex (original)
+++ python/trunk/Doc/howto/regex.tex Mon Jan 29 21:55:40 2007
@@ -34,17 +34,18 @@
The \module{re} module was added in Python 1.5, and provides
Perl-style regular expression patterns. Earlier versions of Python
came with the \module{regex} module, which provided Emacs-style
-patterns. \module{regex} module was removed in Python 2.5.
+patterns. The \module{regex} module was removed completely in Python 2.5.
-Regular expressions (or REs) are essentially a tiny, highly
-specialized programming language embedded inside Python and made
-available through the \module{re} module. Using this little language,
-you specify the rules for the set of possible strings that you want to
-match; this set might contain English sentences, or e-mail addresses,
-or TeX commands, or anything you like. You can then ask questions
-such as ``Does this string match the pattern?'', or ``Is there a match
-for the pattern anywhere in this string?''. You can also use REs to
-modify a string or to split it apart in various ways.
+Regular expressions (called REs, or regexes, or regex patterns) are
+essentially a tiny, highly specialized programming language embedded
+inside Python and made available through the \module{re} module.
+Using this little language, you specify the rules for the set of
+possible strings that you want to match; this set might contain
+English sentences, or e-mail addresses, or TeX commands, or anything
+you like. You can then ask questions such as ``Does this string match
+the pattern?'', or ``Is there a match for the pattern anywhere in this
+string?''. You can also use REs to modify a string or to split it
+apart in various ways.
Regular expression patterns are compiled into a series of bytecodes
which are then executed by a matching engine written in C. For
@@ -80,11 +81,12 @@
would let this RE match \samp{Test} or \samp{TEST} as well; more
about this later.)
-There are exceptions to this rule; some characters are
-special, and don't match themselves. Instead, they signal that some
-out-of-the-ordinary thing should be matched, or they affect other
-portions of the RE by repeating them. Much of this document is
-devoted to discussing various metacharacters and what they do.
+There are exceptions to this rule; some characters are special
+\dfn{metacharacters}, and don't match themselves. Instead, they
+signal that some out-of-the-ordinary thing should be matched, or they
+affect other portions of the RE by repeating them or changing their
+meaning. Much of this document is devoted to discussing various
+metacharacters and what they do.
Here's a complete list of the metacharacters; their meanings will be
discussed in the rest of this HOWTO.
@@ -111,9 +113,10 @@
usually a metacharacter, but inside a character class it's stripped of
its special nature.
-You can match the characters not within a range by \dfn{complementing}
-the set. This is indicated by including a \character{\^} as the first
-character of the class; \character{\^} elsewhere will simply match the
+You can match the characters not listed within the class by
+\dfn{complementing} the set. This is indicated by including a
+\character{\^} as the first character of the class; \character{\^}
+outside a character class will simply match the
\character{\^} character. For example, \verb|[^5]| will match any
character except \character{5}.
@@ -176,7 +179,7 @@
For example, \regexp{ca*t} will match \samp{ct} (0 \samp{a}
characters), \samp{cat} (1 \samp{a}), \samp{caaat} (3 \samp{a}
characters), and so forth. The RE engine has various internal
-limitations stemming from the size of C's \code{int} type, that will
+limitations stemming from the size of C's \code{int} type that will
prevent it from matching over 2 billion \samp{a} characters; you
probably don't have enough memory to construct a string that large, so
you shouldn't run into that limit.
@@ -238,9 +241,9 @@
You can omit either \var{m} or \var{n}; in that case, a reasonable
value is assumed for the missing value. Omitting \var{m} is
-interpreted as a lower limit of 0, while omitting \var{n} results in an
-upper bound of infinity --- actually, the 2 billion limit mentioned
-earlier, but that might as well be infinity.
+interpreted as a lower limit of 0, while omitting \var{n} results in
+an upper bound of infinity --- actually, the upper bound is the
+2-billion limit mentioned earlier, but that might as well be infinity.
Readers of a reductionist bent may notice that the three other qualifiers
can all be expressed using this notation. \regexp{\{0,\}} is the same
@@ -285,7 +288,7 @@
no need to bloat the language specification by including them.)
Instead, the \module{re} module is simply a C extension module
included with Python, just like the \module{socket} or \module{zlib}
-module.
+modules.
Putting REs in strings keeps the Python language simpler, but has one
disadvantage which is the topic of the next section.
@@ -326,7 +329,7 @@
a string literal prefixed with \character{r}, so \code{r"\e n"} is a
two-character string containing \character{\e} and \character{n},
while \code{"\e n"} is a one-character string containing a newline.
-Frequently regular expressions will be expressed in Python
+Regular expressions will often be written in Python
code using this raw string notation.
\begin{tableii}{c|c}{code}{Regular String}{Raw string}
@@ -368,9 +371,9 @@
\file{redemo.py} can be quite useful when trying to debug a
complicated RE. Phil Schwartz's
\ulink{Kodos}{http://www.phil-schwartz.com/kodos.spy} is also an interactive
-tool for developing and testing RE patterns. This HOWTO will use the
-standard Python interpreter for its examples.
+tool for developing and testing RE patterns.
+This HOWTO uses the standard Python interpreter for its examples.
First, run the Python interpreter, import the \module{re} module, and
compile a RE:
@@ -401,7 +404,7 @@
later use.
\begin{verbatim}
->>> m = p.match( 'tempo')
+>>> m = p.match('tempo')
>>> print m
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 80c4f68>
\end{verbatim}
@@ -472,9 +475,9 @@
\end{verbatim}
\method{findall()} has to create the entire list before it can be
-returned as the result. In Python 2.2, the \method{finditer()} method
-is also available, returning a sequence of \class{MatchObject} instances
-as an iterator.
+returned as the result. The \method{finditer()} method returns a
+sequence of \class{MatchObject} instances as an
+iterator.\footnote{Introduced in Python 2.2.2.}
\begin{verbatim}
>>> iterator = p.finditer('12 drummers drumming, 11 ... 10 ...')
@@ -491,13 +494,13 @@
\subsection{Module-Level Functions}
-You don't have to produce a \class{RegexObject} and call its methods;
+You don't have to create a \class{RegexObject} and call its methods;
the \module{re} module also provides top-level functions called
-\function{match()}, \function{search()}, \function{sub()}, and so
-forth. These functions take the same arguments as the corresponding
-\class{RegexObject} method, with the RE string added as the first
-argument, and still return either \code{None} or a \class{MatchObject}
-instance.
+\function{match()}, \function{search()}, \function{findall()},
+\function{sub()}, and so forth. These functions take the same
+arguments as the corresponding \class{RegexObject} method, with the RE
+string added as the first argument, and still return either
+\code{None} or a \class{MatchObject} instance.
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print re.match(r'From\s+', 'Fromage amk')
@@ -514,7 +517,7 @@
Should you use these module-level functions, or should you get the
\class{RegexObject} and call its methods yourself? That choice
depends on how frequently the RE will be used, and on your personal
-coding style. If a RE is being used at only one point in the code,
+coding style. If the RE is being used at only one point in the code,
then the module functions are probably more convenient. If a program
contains a lot of regular expressions, or re-uses the same ones in
several locations, then it might be worthwhile to collect all the
@@ -537,7 +540,7 @@
Compilation flags let you modify some aspects of how regular
expressions work. Flags are available in the \module{re} module under
-two names, a long name such as \constant{IGNORECASE}, and a short,
+two names, a long name such as \constant{IGNORECASE} and a short,
one-letter form such as \constant{I}. (If you're familiar with Perl's
pattern modifiers, the one-letter forms use the same letters; the
short form of \constant{re.VERBOSE} is \constant{re.X}, for example.)
@@ -617,7 +620,7 @@
format them. When this flag has been specified, whitespace within the
RE string is ignored, except when the whitespace is in a character
class or preceded by an unescaped backslash; this lets you organize
-and indent the RE more clearly. It also enables you to put comments
+and indent the RE more clearly. This flag also lets you put comments
within a RE that will be ignored by the engine; comments are marked by
a \character{\#} that's neither in a character class or preceded by an
unescaped backslash.
@@ -629,18 +632,19 @@
charref = re.compile(r"""
&[#] # Start of a numeric entity reference
(
- [0-9]+[^0-9] # Decimal form
- | 0[0-7]+[^0-7] # Octal form
- | x[0-9a-fA-F]+[^0-9a-fA-F] # Hexadecimal form
+ 0[0-7]+ # Octal form
+ | [0-9]+ # Decimal form
+ | x[0-9a-fA-F]+ # Hexadecimal form
)
+ ; # Trailing semicolon
""", re.VERBOSE)
\end{verbatim}
Without the verbose setting, the RE would look like this:
\begin{verbatim}
-charref = re.compile("&#([0-9]+[^0-9]"
- "|0[0-7]+[^0-7]"
- "|x[0-9a-fA-F]+[^0-9a-fA-F])")
+charref = re.compile("&#(0[0-7]+"
+ "|[0-9]+"
+ "|x[0-9a-fA-F]+);")
\end{verbatim}
In the above example, Python's automatic concatenation of string
@@ -722,12 +726,12 @@
\item[\regexp{\e A}] Matches only at the start of the string. When
not in \constant{MULTILINE} mode, \regexp{\e A} and \regexp{\^} are
-effectively the same. In \constant{MULTILINE} mode, however, they're
-different; \regexp{\e A} still matches only at the beginning of the
+effectively the same. In \constant{MULTILINE} mode, they're
+different: \regexp{\e A} still matches only at the beginning of the
string, but \regexp{\^} may match at any location inside the string
that follows a newline character.
-\item[\regexp{\e Z}]Matches only at the end of the string.
+\item[\regexp{\e Z}] Matches only at the end of the string.
\item[\regexp{\e b}] Word boundary.
This is a zero-width assertion that matches only at the
@@ -782,14 +786,23 @@
strings by writing a RE divided into several subgroups which
match different components of interest. For example, an RFC-822
header line is divided into a header name and a value, separated by a
-\character{:}. This can be handled by writing a regular expression
+\character{:}, like this:
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+From: author at example.com
+User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061227)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+To: editor at example.com
+\end{verbatim}
+
+This can be handled by writing a regular expression
which matches an entire header line, and has one group which matches the
header name, and another group which matches the header's value.
Groups are marked by the \character{(}, \character{)} metacharacters.
\character{(} and \character{)} have much the same meaning as they do
in mathematical expressions; they group together the expressions
-contained inside them. For example, you can repeat the contents of a
+contained inside them, and you can repeat the contents of a
group with a repeating qualifier, such as \regexp{*}, \regexp{+},
\regexp{?}, or \regexp{\{\var{m},\var{n}\}}. For example,
\regexp{(ab)*} will match zero or more repetitions of \samp{ab}.
@@ -881,12 +894,13 @@
syntax for regular expression extensions, so we'll look at that first.
Perl 5 added several additional features to standard regular
-expressions, and the Python \module{re} module supports most of them.
-It would have been difficult to choose new single-keystroke
-metacharacters or new special sequences beginning with \samp{\e} to
-represent the new features without making Perl's regular expressions
-confusingly different from standard REs. If you chose \samp{\&} as a
-new metacharacter, for example, old expressions would be assuming that
+expressions, and the Python \module{re} module supports most of them.
+It would have been difficult to choose new
+single-keystroke metacharacters or new special sequences beginning
+with \samp{\e} to represent the new features without making Perl's
+regular expressions confusingly different from standard REs. If you
+chose \samp{\&} as a new metacharacter, for example, old expressions
+would be assuming that
\samp{\&} was a regular character and wouldn't have escaped it by
writing \regexp{\e \&} or \regexp{[\&]}.
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list