[Python-checkins] python/nondist/peps pep-0322.txt,1.3,1.4

[rhettinger at users.sourceforge.net]

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv11227

Modified Files:
	pep-0322.txt 
Log Message:
Rename the proposal to ireverse().

Index: pep-0322.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0322.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -C2 -d -r1.3 -r1.4
*** pep-0322.txt	26 Sep 2003 03:07:56 -0000	1.3
--- pep-0322.txt	26 Sep 2003 16:09:54 -0000	1.4
***************
*** 47,59 ****
  ========
  
! Add a method called *iter_backwards()* to sequence objects that can
  benefit from it.  The above examples then simplify to::
  
!     for i in xrange(n).iter_backwards():
          print seqn[i]
  
  ::
  
!     for elem in seqn.iter_backwards():
          print elem
  
--- 47,59 ----
  ========
  
! Add a method called *ireverse()* to sequence objects that can
  benefit from it.  The above examples then simplify to::
  
!     for i in xrange(n).ireverse():
          print seqn[i]
  
  ::
  
!     for elem in seqn.ireverse():
          print elem
  
***************
*** 105,109 ****
    and clearer with::
  
!     for func, target, kargs in _exithandlers.iter_backwards():
          . . .
      del _exithandlers
--- 105,109 ----
    and clearer with::
  
!     for func, target, kargs in _exithandlers.ireverse():
          . . .
      del _exithandlers
***************
*** 132,136 ****
  
        result.sort()
!       return [x for score, x in result[-n:].iter_backwards()]
  
  * heapq.heapify() uses ``for i in xrange(n//2 - 1, -1, -1)`` because
--- 132,136 ----
  
        result.sort()
!       return [x for score, x in result[-n:].ireverse()]
  
  * heapq.heapify() uses ``for i in xrange(n//2 - 1, -1, -1)`` because
***************
*** 159,163 ****
    be run in a forward direction but is less intuitive and rarely
    presented that way in literature.  The replacement code
!   ``for i in xrange(1, len(x)).iter_backwards()`` is much easier
    to mentally verify.
  
--- 159,163 ----
    be run in a forward direction but is less intuitive and rarely
    presented that way in literature.  The replacement code
!   ``for i in xrange(1, len(x)).ireverse()`` is much easier
    to mentally verify.