[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Doc/lib libstdtypes.tex, 1.136, 1.137

[fdrake at users.sourceforge.net]

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4106

Modified Files:
	libstdtypes.tex 
Log Message:
markup fixes; this would not format


Index: libstdtypes.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.136
retrieving revision 1.137
diff -C2 -d -r1.136 -r1.137
*** libstdtypes.tex	18 Oct 2003 09:55:08 -0000	1.136
--- libstdtypes.tex	21 Oct 2003 17:04:21 -0000	1.137
***************
*** 1045,1054 ****
    much faster than specifying an equivalent \var{cmp} function.  This is
    because \var{cmp} is called multiple times for each list element while
!   \var{key} and \{reverse} touch each element only once.
  
    \versionchanged[Support for \code{None} as an equivalent to omitting
    \var{cmpfunc} was added]{2.3}
  
!   \versionadded[Support for \var{key} and \var{reverse} was added]{2.4}
  
  \item[(9)]  Starting with Python 2.3, the \method{sort()} method is
--- 1045,1054 ----
    much faster than specifying an equivalent \var{cmp} function.  This is
    because \var{cmp} is called multiple times for each list element while
!   \var{key} and \var{reverse} touch each element only once.
  
    \versionchanged[Support for \code{None} as an equivalent to omitting
    \var{cmpfunc} was added]{2.3}
  
!   \versionchanged[Support for \var{key} and \var{reverse} was added]{2.4}
  
  \item[(9)]  Starting with Python 2.3, the \method{sort()} method is