[Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/peps pep-0201.txt,1.5,1.6

Barry Warsaw python-dev@python.org
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:00:08 -0700


Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory slayer.i.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv13321

Modified Files:
	pep-0201.txt 
Log Message:
Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives
in Open Issues.


Index: pep-0201.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0201.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -C2 -r1.5 -r1.6
*** pep-0201.txt	2000/07/25 21:51:55	1.5
--- pep-0201.txt	2000/07/25 22:00:05	1.6
***************
*** 376,383 ****
        (but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
        interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
!       plait, fold, and with.  All have disadvantages, and there is no
!       clear unanimous choice, therefore the decision was made to go
!       with `zip' because the same functionality is available in other
!       languages (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
  
      - Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be
--- 376,386 ----
        (but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
        interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
!       plait, fold, with, mktuples, maketuples, totuples, gentuples,
!       tupleorama.
! 
!       All have disadvantages, and there is no clear unanimous choice,
!       therefore the decision was made to go with `zip' because the
!       same functionality is available in other languages
!       (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
  
      - Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be