[Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/peps pep-0201.txt,1.5,1.6
Barry Warsaw
python-dev@python.org
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:00:08 -0700
Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory slayer.i.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv13321
Modified Files:
pep-0201.txt
Log Message:
Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives
in Open Issues.
Index: pep-0201.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0201.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -C2 -r1.5 -r1.6
*** pep-0201.txt 2000/07/25 21:51:55 1.5
--- pep-0201.txt 2000/07/25 22:00:05 1.6
***************
*** 376,383 ****
(but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
! plait, fold, and with. All have disadvantages, and there is no
! clear unanimous choice, therefore the decision was made to go
! with `zip' because the same functionality is available in other
! languages (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
- Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be
--- 376,386 ----
(but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
! plait, fold, with, mktuples, maketuples, totuples, gentuples,
! tupleorama.
!
! All have disadvantages, and there is no clear unanimous choice,
! therefore the decision was made to go with `zip' because the
! same functionality is available in other languages
! (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
- Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be